nteresting. First of all Bush is lying in this speech by saying his Administration never said that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11. Then he goes on saying that the main reason for the U.S. to go into Iraq was to create stability and peace in the Middle East, although he had no legal reason to interfere in the politics of a foreign country, which was not (and is not) an immediate threat to the U.S.. He further says Saddam had no Weapons of Mass Destruction, although he THOUGHT he had at the moment(!) Then he justifies the invasion by claiming that Saddam had the power to build WMD and could thus be a future threat...

OK, let's get this straight. The U.S do have WMD and we ARE a threat to the world peace. If Iran or some other foreign country would invade the U.S. for the same reasons Bush is invading Iraq, we would be furious and do anything in our power to defend ourselves, and even call the invaders terrorists(?). So what's the difference, somebody?