any people wonder how, if as the British and U.S government have
always claimed that U.F.O’s do not exist, how can computer nerd
Gary
McKinnon be charged with breaking into U.S. files and
reading them?
How can you read what does not exist?
And we are told 97 of these U.S defence computers held this
U.F.O data.
So to prosecute him, means an about turn on official policy and
all statements since Roswell in 1947.
Today Gary was sent to the U.S.A. to go on trial.
Enforced rendition has already been declared illegal under
international law.
Remember, the Human Rights act instructs us that a prosecution
based on untruths cannot legally go ahead, and both British and
U.S administrations have based their complaint on a bed of lies.
But why not?
The British government lies continually, over Iraq, immigration,
the N.H.S, crime rates, the Deepcut army barrack murders, the
heterophobic agenda, W.M.Ds, and so much more.
So after so many opportunities to tell the truth to the public
over the huge numbers of U.F.O sightings.
The recent admission that U.F.Os do exist after all, but are in
the main are dismissed as reflections, light distortions,
Japanese fishing boats, and cloud formations, was only
forthcoming as a rearguard action to distort the mass of
classified information released, if Gary is convicted.
Lets not forget that spy Jonathan Pollard has claimed Mossad
hacked the U.S defence files for Israel on a daily basis year in
year out, yet no convictions here.
But lies are an essential part of the British diet.
The result is that none believes any government statement any
more, particularly on U.F.Os and only a fool will think his
vote means anything.
As a footnote a U S embassy spokesman said to me yesterday;
“The
U.S administration is very aware of the strength of feeling
right now, we value British co-operation in global policy,
do not worry he will be treated fairly, and will probably
end up working for us “
This sounds like good news here.
