There
is a solution other than what the elite consider excess
population. Why not prevent the poor - for the sake of
argument, let us venture a conservative 99% of the
world's population - from having children altogether, or
if that isn't possible, at least vastly slow their birth
rates?
"Eugenics" is a term coined in the
latter part of the 19th century by Englishmen Francis
Galton to describe the
"science"
of bettering human stock and the elimination of unwanted
characteristics... and individuals. Galton proposed
societal intervention for the furtherance of "racial
quality," maintaining that "Jews are specialized for a
parasitical existence upon other nations" and that
"except by sterilization I cannot yet see any way of
checking the produce of the unfit who are allowed their
liberty and are below the reach of moral control."
A survey of eugenics in action begins
with isolated incidents such as the sterilization of the
mentally ill by American health officials in the late
1800's and the castration of children at the
Pennsylvania Training School for Feebleminded Children
in 1889. The movement quickly picked up momentum.
Formerly established as a study at
University College in London in 1904, the first
laboratory for the study of the subject was constructed
by Charles B. Davenport at Cold Springs Harbor on Long
Island (which, perhaps significantly, was also the
location of the estates of both Dulles brothers, as well
as the current headquarters of the Human Genome
Organization for DNA mapping). The institute was funded
in excess of $11 million by the Harriman and
Rockefellers.
Supported in America by the Eastern
Establishment, eugenics was nurtured in the hotbeds of
Round Table-influenced philosophy, at Harvard, Columbia,
and Cornell. The subject was popularized in Germany by
Ernst Haeckel, who linked romantic German nature
mysticism and the unity of the Volk with clinical
bio-policies later instituted by Hitler.
Haeckel believed that there was no
unity among the species of mankind, since "the
morphological differences
between
two generally recognized species - for example sheep and
goats - are much less important than those... between a
Hottentot and a man of the Teutonic race." In the Aryan
race Haeckel saw a "symmetry of all parts, and that
equal development, which we call the perfect human
beauty." He also believed the "wooly-haired" peoples
"incapable of true inner culture or of a higher mental
development... no wooly-haired nation has ever had an
important history."
Haeckel felt the purpose of the
nation state was to enforce selective breeding, praising
the practices of the Spartans who killed all but
"perfectly healthy and strong children" and thus were
"continually in excellent strength and vigor."
In 1906 a group of Haeckel's academic
followers formed the influential Monist League,
agitating for a German government patterned along social
Darwinian lines.
By 1907 in America, Indiana passed
compulsory sterilization for the mentally ill and other
"undesirables," while 475 males received vasectomies at
the Indiana State Reformatory.
In 1912 the First International
Congress of Eugenics was held in London, including among
its directors Winston Churchill, Alexander Graham Bell,
Charles Elliot (President emeritus of Harvard
University), and David Starr Jordan (President of
Stanford University).
The National Conference on Race
Betterment was convened in United States in 1914, while
by 1917 fifteen American states had eugenics laws on the
books, almost all of them legalizing the sterilization
of habitual criminals, epileptics, the insane, and the
retarded.
H.H. Laughlin, the Expert Eugenics
Agent of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
Immigration and Naturalization presented a Model
Sterilization Law in 1922. This was to provide the basis
for many state eugenics laws, as well as for eugenics
law in Nazi Germany.
In 1928 the American Eugenics Society
sponsored a contest for essays on the caused of decline
in Nordic fertility, while Dr. Robie, at the Third
International Congress of Eugenics, called for the
sterilization of 14,000,000 Americans with low
intelligence scores.
The Nazi Party in Germany passed in
1933 the "Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases
in Posterity," also
known
as the "Sterilization Law," written by professor Ernst
Rudin, one of the country's leading psychiatrists.
"Heredity Health Courts" were formed, and within three
years two hundred and twenty-five thousand German
"undesirables" had been sterilized.
Hitler's policies have been
characterized as "a rather straightforward form of
German social Darwinism." Far from being original with
him, his policies were expansions upon already-extant
political and scientific culture.
By 1939 German policies had evolved
to include euthanasia upon asylum inmates while eugenics
concepts were implemented to the fullest in Nazi
concentration camps during World War II.
In 1942, U.S. psychiatrist Foster
Kennedy recommended the killing of retarded children.
During the three year period between 1941-1943 over
42,000 people were sterilized in America.
After World War II the idea of
"eugenics" was tainted in the public by its association
with Nazism. The term was discarded and a facelift was
performed on its parent study psychiatry, which resulted
in the establishment of the World Federation of Mental
Health (WFMH). Since then, this group has continued to
support electroshock, lobotomization, mind control and
other activities already detailed, as well as employing
within its ranks many German practitioners who had been
happy to further Hitlerian goals during the Second World
War.
What this brief survey shows is
something the popular press has chosen to ignore:
eugenics programs were not the inventions of mad Nazi
scientists, but that the political climate of Germany
allowed a full implementation of programs part and
parcel of international psychiatry and medicine.
Eugenics, from its beginning, was encouraged and
financed by the rich self-styled "aristocrats" of the
day.
Recent programs aimed at abortion and
other methods of depopulation can be traced to
essentially the same Freemasonic/Round
Table/Rothschild-spawned crowd; to the studies of the
Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, and to the CFR.
These groups influenced a change in U.S. policies
specifically during 1966-67, when population control was
adopted by the State Department as a stated goal.
The recent world depopulation push
retains the flavor of eugenics bio-policy of the first
half of this century in the statements of advocates such
as the Eastern Establishment's Sergeant Shriver,
speaking before the Congressional Select Committee on
Population in 1978: "...this Committee's interest [is]
in improving the quality of life and enhancing the
biological product of this society; rather than just
controlling or limiting birds."
Jaffe and Dryfoos of the
federally-funded Guttmacher Institute have stated that,
"With the overall decline in fertility in the United
States, concern has shifted from numbers of births to
insuring that those children being born have fewer
physical, social and economic handicaps."
It is odd that little mention of "the
overall decline in fertility" finds its way into
Rockefeller-subsidized literature of depopulation
activists. Nor was the fact that teenage pregnancy was
at its lowest ebb in forty years brought up when
federally mandated family planning and sex education in
schools was enacted in 1978.
Studies have shown that sex education
classes increase early sexual experimentation while
doing nothing to reduce adolescent pregnancy. It has
also been demonstrated that when such classes are
discontinued, as in Utah in 1980, the incidence of
teenage pregnancy decreases. Still, officials insist sex
classes should extend from "kindergarten throughout a
person's educational career." Why? Originators and
administrators of the programs candidly admit that their
agenda includes depopulation and eugenics.
Lester Kirkendall, a founder of the
Sex Information and Education Council, wrote in 1965
that, "sex education is... clearly tied in a socially
significant way to family planning and population
limitation and policy..." Dr. Jane Hodgson, at the
National Abortion Federation conference in 1980, was
even more forthright, calling for compulsory abortion
for pregnant teenagers.
The methods of sex education programs
in public schools vary, but uniformly emphasize the huge
expense and drawbacks of having kids, providing
summaries of methods of contraception, serialization,
and abortion. Students are often taken on tours of birth
control clinics, where they meet the staff, fill out
patients' forms, and are assured of the confidentiality
of services. Children are also recruited as depopulation
activists with pitches informing them, as in widely-used
text Meeting Yourself Halfway:
“The population problem is very
serious and involves every country on this planet.
What steps would you encourage to help resolve the
problem?
...volunteer to organize
birth-control information centers throughout the
country;
...join a pro-abortion lobbying group;
...encourage the limitation of two children per
family and have the parents sterilized to prevent
further births.”
Much of the sex education literature
portrays the nuclear family – long a cohesive political
and social glue among the populace – as obsolete and
statistically insignificant, while the normalcy of
homosexuality and bachelorism ("Playboyism") is
stressed. Children are encouraged to report in detail on
conditions at home, to report parental shortcomings, and
to divulge disagreements they have with their parents,
opening the door to intervention by "social services."
Davis in
Economic Development and Cultural Change says
that an effective strategy in lowering the birth rate is
to "lessen ... the identity of children with parents, or
lessen... the likelihood that this identity will be
satisfying,"
adding
that certain trends that might bring population levels
down are "very high divorce rates, homosexuality,
pornography and free sexual unions..." Davis sees a
positive note in "the child welfare services, which have
increasingly tended to displace the father as a
necessary member of the family, and the health services
which have increasingly flouted parental authority with
respect to contraception and abortion." This "flouting
of parental authority" is a familiar theme in sex
education classes, which repeatedly emphasize the
child's independence from their parents and their
ability to make decisions for themselves.
The message to children, provided by
proponents of sex education without the courtesy of
having the parents agree upon it, is obvious; the world
is awash in excess poor population, and something has to
be done about it in a hurry, starting at the nearest
abortion clinic.
Educator John Taylor Gatto, voted New
York's Top Teacher of 1991, further comments on the
mechanisms:
“Social machinery to suppress
proliferation of systematic families... has two
components: one, a campaign aimed at
family-formation before it commences, employing such
tactics as encouragement of personal greed (best
enjoyed in bachelor style, of course), public
pornographic celebrations of the body parts of
nubile young woman, effortless divorce, mass
adoption, tolerance of sexual ambiguity, and many
similar tactics. The second component aims at
producing pseudo-families: small households (whether
biological or synthetic) without any overriding
loyalty to the common family cause. Instead, these
are associations of expedience wearing the costume
of affection and concern, but always on the lookout
for a better deal... During the childhood phase,
parents in pseudo-families are made use of by the
state to transmit certain values, to maintain and
discipline a new serf class composed of their own
children, and to report radical cases of deviance to
medical, police and re-training authorities... It is
a system infused in many places with such black
genius in understanding crowd control it is hard not
to stand in awe of its unseen architects.”
Target populations for sterilization
in the United States bear noting. According to Michael
Garrity in
Trilateralism, edited by Holly Sklar, American
Indian women are being sterilized unbeknownst to them or
against their wishes in public health clinics
nationwide. Garrity also maintains, "Full blooded Indian
woman are the special target of the doctors."
Ruthann Evannoff, in "Reproductive
Rights and Occupational Health" in WIN, has said
that, "Overall, at least 25 percent of the Native
American women of childbearing age have been sterilized,
although the total population numbers less than one
million. Recent reports estimate that the percentage
sterilized in one tribe alone, the Northern Cheyenne, is
close to 80 percent."
The secret (now declassified) paper
NSSM 200, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth
For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," also known as
the Scowcroft Document (authored by the CFR's Brent
Scowcroft), gives insight into U.S. government plans for
population reduction internationally, linking these
plans to goals that have very little to do with
alleviating human suffering, and everything to do with
the maximization of profit.
Prepared in 1974 for the National
Security Council (and remember, this is a government
document, although one not likely to be offered for free
in late night Public Service Announcements) NSSm 200
proposes means for the reduction of worldwide population
by "concentration on key [i.e. Third World] countries,"
with the stated goal of reduction of population growth
rate from an annual 2 percent growth to 1.7 percent.
While this might sound like an
altruistic goal proposed by clear-sighted social
stewards, intended to reduce suffering in countries with
marginal standards of living, the study makes it clear
that government interest in depopulation has nothing to
do with concern for living standards in developing
countries. It is because "The United States has become
increasingly dependent on mineral imports from
developing countries" and " endemic famine, food riots,
and breakdown of social order... are scarcely inducive
to systematic exploration for mineral deposits or the
long-term investments necessary for their exploration."
Note that the breakdown of "social order" referred to
consists of the populace revolting against their living
conditions.
One of the conclusions of the study
is that "mandatory [emphasis added] population
control measures" may be "appropriate."
Speaking of depopulation programs
currently being implemented in the Third World, former
Brazilian health minister Carlos Santana said, "The
World Bank, through their reports of its Presidents, has
always made its proselytizing for a rigid birth control
policy explicit," Santana reported that included in
World Bank credit packages and investment in Third World
countries is an implicit agenda of depopulation, and
questioned why Brazil was targeted for birth reduction,
with approximately forty per cent of Brazilian woman
having been already sterilized.
What the depopulators omit saying is
that in Brazil mast of the depopulation programs are
being directed toward the native population, and that
they are implementing an alternative program to the
pistoleiros hired to attack small landowning
families, appropriating the land for the use of large
cash-croppers and the international conglomerates that
are stripping the country bare.
Depopulation programs run worldwide
are directed and funded by major international money
interests,
including
McGeorge Bundy of the CFR, the architect of nuclear
Mutual Assured Destruction policy; Warren E. Buffet, the
second wealthiest man in the United States; and,
ubiquitous when it comes to eugenics funding, the
Rockefellers.
Planned Parenthood Federation of
America and International Planned Parenthood Federation
are Buffett-funded and run a huge abortion and
sterilization network worldwide, with one subsidiary,
the Brazilian Society for Family Welfare, having over
2,500 outlets in that country.
While, at first glance depopulation
programs may seem like a good idea to promote the
reduction of mouths-to-feed worldwide, what they ignore
are the root causes of overpopulation. High birth rates
are the direct result of poor living standards of he
areas, and in countries where malnutrition has been
reduced and the incidence of child-death lowered, birth
rates have also lessened.
The Third World (in particular) is
being forcefully relieved of natural resources and
exploited for cheap labor, and is in fact no doubt seen
by elite landowners and major corporations as only
maintaining maximum profitability as long as it is kept
in abject poverty.
"The strategy of underdevelopment" is
the term used by agriculture economist Harry Cleaver.
Rather than
offering
the people in rich countries such as Brazil, in
actuality one of the richest countries in the world, an
equitable portion of profits made through the use of
their resources, they are manipulated (when not killed
outright) and kept at the razor edge between starvation
and profitability.
Depopulation organizations
propagandize that we are experiencing a crisis of epic
proportions; that the world is reaching the point where
it can no longer support the number of people living on
it. In many instances population may in fact be
economically beneficial, and tending to a long-term
increase of arable land and per capita (rather than per
corporation) income. Also noted is a current usage of
approximately three-tenths of one percent of the
planet's surface for human habitation, an amount
sustainable with no limit to growth on sight.
United Nations and U.S. Department of
Agriculture statistics show that world food production
has increased more rapidly than population growth in
recent years, while Colin Clark, former director of the
Agriculture Economic Institute of Oxford University has
stated that farmers could currently support seven times
the current population of the Earth, or twenty-one times
the current population at Japanese standards of food
consumption.
Roger Revelle, former director of the
Harvard Center for Population Studies estimates that
current agricultural resources could provide an adequate
diet for eight times the current populace, i.e. forty
billion individuals, and has estimated that Africa is
capable of feeding ten times its current population.
Revelle quotes Dr. David Hopper, another agricultural
expert:
"The world's food problem does not
arise from any physical limitation on potential output
or any danger of unduly stressing the environment. The
limitations on abundance are to be found in social and
political structures of nations and in the economic
relations among them. The unexploited global food
resources are there, between Cancer and Capricorn. The
successful husbandry of that resource depends on the
will and actions of men." Hopper pronounces "world
fascism" very politely.
Francis Moore Lappe of the Institute
for Food and Development Policy maintains:
"If the cause of hunger is neither
scarcity of food, nor scarcity of land, we've come to
see that it's a scarcity of democracy. That may sound
rather contrived, because in the West we tend to think
of democracy as a political concept. But democracy is
really a principle of accountability; in other words,
those making the decisions must be accountable to those
who are affected by them. Once we understand hunger as a
scarcity of democracy, what we are saying is that from
the village level to the level of international
commerce, fewer and fewer people are making decisions,
and more and more anti-democratic structures are being
entrenched. This is the cause of hunger." And, it should
be repeated, the cause of overpopulation.
“[Sterilization could] be applied
to an ever widening circle of social discards,
beginning always with the criminal, the diseased and
the insane, and extending gradually to types which
may be called weaklings rather than defectives, and
perhaps ultimately to worthless race types.”
- The Passing of the
Great Race by Madison Grant, co-founder
American Eugenics Society
“The very word eugenics is in
disrepute in some quarters ... We must ask
ourselves, what have we done wrong?
I think we have failed to take
into account a trait which is almost universal and
is very deep in human nature. People simply are not
willing to accept the idea that the genetic base on
which their character was formed is inferior and
should not be repeated in the next generation. We
have asked whole groups of people to accept this
idea and we have asked individuals to accept it.
They have constantly refused and we have all but
killed the eugenic movement ... they won't accept
the idea that they are in general second rate. We
must rely on other motivation. ... it is surely
possible to build a system of voluntary unconscious
selection. But the reasons advanced must be
generally acceptable reasons. Let's stop telling
anyone that they have a generally inferior genetic
quality, for they will never agree. Let's base our
proposals on the desirability of having children
born in homes where they will get affectionate and
responsible care, and perhaps our proposals will be
accepted.”
- From Galton and Mid
Century Eugenics by Frederick Osborn,
Galton Lecture 1956, in Eugenics Review, vol.
48, 1, 1956
“Those least fit to carry on the
race are increasing most rapidly ... Funds that
should be used to raise the standard of our
civilization are diverted to maintenance of those
who should never have been born.”
- From The Pivot of
Civilization quoted in Margaret Sanger
(founder of Planned Parenthood), by Elsah
Droghin.
Further Reading & Research
Octopus Conspiracy Claims Another (Jim Keith dead)
Things Are Gonna Slide
The Sad Passing of Jim Keith
Jim Keith's Big Secret
This article was first posted here:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/depopulation.htm