n the midst of the imploding US and European
financial systems and the resultant
bankruptcies, nationalizations and bailouts the
People’s Daily, China’s official newspaper,
called for a new global currency to replace the
US dollar. Writing in the People’s Daily
edition of 17 September 2008 Professor Shi
Jianxun of Shanghai’s Tongji University said
that "[t]he world urgently needs to create a
diversified currency and financial system and
fair and just financial order that is not
dependent on the United States."
This was later followed by a Friday 26 September
address by Prime Minister Gordon Brown before the
United Nations in which he called for a new "global
financial order." It is to be based on
"transparency, not opacity, rewarding success not
excess, responsibility, not impunity, and …is [to
be] global not national." Brown went on to say "We
must clearly state that the age of irresponsibility
must be [at an] end." As the G20 nations prepare to
meet in Washington this week Mr. Brown has again
called for a new global financial order, a Bretton
Woods II. Mr. Brown wants the Middle East oil
producers and China to assist in contributing to the
bailouts taking place in the United States and
Europe. In calling for such contributions Mr. Brown
is effectively admitting the United States and
Europe are broke and have exhausted their government
(and central bank) resources in an effort to cure
this massive market correction (frequently called a
recession, deep recession or even depression) which
has been underway since August 2007. China has
announced its own stimulus program but it is unclear
whether included in the 4 trillion Yuan amount are
new programs or existing ones or a combination of
both (my Chinese friends who are cynical about
China’s government leaders laughingly tell me it
probably includes the infrastructure projects for
China’s 2008 Olympics as well).
Professor Jianxun is right to express concern about
the financial leadership of the United States and
the United States dollar in light of the events
taking place in Washington and in the capitals of
Europe. Estimates by financial analysts of the
various bailouts of US financial institutions, the
US automobile industry and god knows who all are at
$2.7 trillion dollars with more bailouts likely to
come. In Australia in addition to bailing out the
automotive industry the government is assisting in
the rescue of childcare operator ABC Learning
Centres with a A$22 million dollar injection to keep
the company afloat until the end of the year. The
administrator appointed to oversee the company has
estimated that 40% of the company’s childcare
centres are unprofitable. Another example of the
management of a company assuming inflation by
central banks would continue forever without there
being any correction.
Any sane person would have to wonder how the United
States taxpayer (as well as the taxpayers of other
countries) will pay for all of this while at the
same time trying to recover and
grow the US economy
and strengthen the US dollar. The national debt of
the United States is likely to go well above $11
trillion when totaling up all the financial risks
proposing to be addressed by the US Treasury and the
US Federal Reserve (we can be sure that $700 billion
is not the final cost of the bill for the bailout;
already AIG has been refinanced with $150 billion).
For example the total derivative risk covered by CDS
(credit default swaps, private contractual financial
instruments insuring against default of debt) which
is what finally sunk Bear Stearns and AIG is
estimated to be $62 trillion and the exposure by US
banks and financial institutions for all derivative
products is estimated to be $180 trillion. The US
House of Representatives recently agreed to bail out
the US automotive industry and is in the process of
considering providing additional money for the
industry. With this bailout the line outside the
corporate soup kitchen is likely to become very long
as the corporate jets start flying into Washington
to get a free meal and a free ride at the expense of
the American taxpayer
In 1999 the US debt was "only" $3.6 trillion; the
government was running a surplus and projecting to
pay off the debt by 2015. What a difference years of
large government intervention have made –
expenditures for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and
other large government expenditures to be paid
through inflation by the Federal Reserve with the
resultant malinvestments. It is not surprising then
that questions arise about US financial management
and the US dollar. It is time to adopt a global
currency for a global economy – a private
asset-based currency rather than a fiat currency
which is subject to political whim, manipulation and
wild swings in value resulting in massive
malinvestments and destruction of savings. It is
time to return to gold as the global private
currency for our global economy. Eliminate fiat
currency, eliminate fractional reserve banking,
eliminate central banks and their government
sponsored banking cartel which has brought about
this massive destruction of wealth.
The technological and financial revolution which has
resulted in a globalized economy and more open
markets among nations has dramatically broken down
trade and other national barriers among countries of
the world. While far from perfectly efficient (due
to the vast array of national protectionist laws and
regulations) we have a global economy in spite of
the attempts by governments to preserve the past
with various national barriers. The least-developed
nations can participate in the globalized economy as
well as can their larger developed neighbors. So why
do we still have over 150 national currencies in the
world today rather than one global currency? Why is
this nationalistic barrier to trade still standing?
The currency and monetary system to be used in a
modern globalized system of trade and development is
simply too important to be left to the numerous
central bank bureaucrats and power brokering
politicians who have various agendas of a political
nature rather than the facilitation of free trade,
free markets, economic development and prosperity
for the people of the world. A global currency
should be in private hands and not under political
control as it is presently.
The establishment of the developed countries must
have sensed the train wreck and thus began to
question whether or not a private system makes more
sense then the current system particularly in light
of the financial crisis which began in August 2007
and continues to worsen almost daily. In an article
published in the Financial Post November 8, 2007
Benn Steil,
Director of International Economics for the Council
on Foreign Relations, says that private money is a
real possibility if the United States does not
"return to long-term fiscal discipline" (raise your
hand if you think the United States government will
return to long-term fiscal discipline).
"As for the United States, it needs to perpetuate
the sound money policies of former Federal Reserve
chairmen Paul Volcker and Alan Greenspan and return
to long-term fiscal discipline. This is the only
sure way to keep the United States' foreign
creditors, with their massive and growing holdings
of dollar debt, feeling wealthy and secure. It is
the market that made the dollar into global money –
and what the market giveth, the market can taketh
away. If…the dollar fails, the market may privatize
money on its own."
Mr. Steil goes to on to say
"…private gold banks already exist, allowing
account holders to make international payments
in the form of shares in actual gold bars.
Although clearly a niche business at present,
gold banking has grown dramatically in recent
years, in tandem with the U.S. dollar's decline.
A new gold-based international monetary system
surely sounds far-fetched. But so, in 1900, did
a monetary system without gold. Modern
technology makes a revival of gold money,
through private gold banks, possible even
without government support."
While it is arguable (among non-Austrian economists)
whether or not the monetary policies of Messrs.
Volcker and Greenspan were sound (many, if not most,
point the finger of blame at Greenspan for today’s
financial problems), it is wishful thinking to
believe for one second that governments and the
government’s financier, their central banks, will
maintain long-term (or even short-term) discipline
in spending and creating money. Their track record
to date is not good and is becoming worse by the
day. The events since August 2007 and particularly
the response by central banks and governments to the
meltdown which began during the week of 15 September
2008 and thereafter clearly indicates that the
prospects for a "return to long-term fiscal
discipline" is poor. The appetite of politicians,
bureaucrats and governments for expansion of power
and spending is too great to resist and the
bureaucrats at central banks are all too eager to
accommodate the demands of the government and the
power broker politicians. It is the reason the
world’s economy has been on a course toward economic
disaster since the flood gates of fiat currency
(initially paper money and now electronically
created money) were opened in 1913 with the passage
of the Federal Reserve Act in the United States.
Gordon Brown’s call for more global regulation and
hence more government intervention is not the
answer. The creation of money and management of the
monetary system should be returned to a free (free
from government intervention) private marketplace in
the United States, Europe and other countries. As
recent events clearly show our property, our wealth
and our lives should not be entrusted to government
bureaucrats and power-brokering politicians who bow
and bend to special political interests rather than
satisfy private consumers’ demands as does the
private marketplace. Let the private free market
determine and provide what consumers want, what will
be money and how the monetary system will function
as the private market does with other products and
services provided in the private marketplace. We
would not think of the government providing our
groceries (scarcity and long lines are the rule from
such a system as we saw in the old Soviet Union and
as we see in Zimbabwe today) so why do we allow the
government to provide and manage something as
important as our monetary system?
It is time for a new world financial order of
private money and a private monetary system. Close
down government-sponsored central banks in the
United States and other countries and end the
government monopoly of creating money and managing
the monetary system which has brought the world
financial system to near collapse. It is time to
return to a private global gold standard for a
global economy.
November 13, 2008
Jacob
Steelman [send
him mail], an American ex-pat, is President of
International Ventures Group a global investment,
finance and development company located in Sydney,
Australia.
Copyright © 2008 LewRockwell.com