Alexander the Great

ome people may argue and say that Globalization is nothing new and we just have to accept that attempts to conquer the world will always be a part of human nature and empires will come and go.

Many of us probably remember our History classes in school where we learnt about Alexander the Great of Macedonia, Julius Caesar of Rome and other "great conquerors", whose mission it was to build a huge empire that could include the whole world, if possible. However, these conquerors always failed, just like Napoleon and Hitler in more recent time. So even if what is happening before our eyes now is disturbing, things will sort out in the end and the present time conquerors, like the United States (who is just a puppet for the real imperialists, the Zionists) will fail eventually. People are dying like flies in the meantime, which is "unfortunate", but this was also the case when Alexander and Caesar ruled. So it is just human nature, right? Everything goes in cycles?

This is exactly what is wrong with education. Someone said that history is extremely important, because if we don't know our history, we will not understand our present; things will repeat themselves and we will not learn from our mistakes. It is all true, but that takes into consideration that the history we learn is the correct one, otherwise we are as lost as ever, because we still don't know our past. So here is another cliché: "History is written by the winners", so therefore we always get a biased version of the past. Again, this is true as well, but to accept this statement as an axiom is a big mistake, because it creates apathy. If we take the statement to heart, it means we accept that we will never know, so therefore history is sort of worthless to learn to some greater extent.

Julius Caesar

You can go and take a history class, and you will see what I mean. Although the ball part of what you learn may be true, what is important in regards to understanding our present time is often excluded from the public schools, and is done so intentionally to protect those in power with a secret agenda. We learn about Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler in great detail, but no one connects the dots for you. And if the dots are not connected, history may seem like unrelated events leading up to certain state of affairs, and because we don't understand the connection, we just wash it off as part of human nature. "It is unfortunate, but that's just the way things are", we think, and those occupied with conquering the world can do so pretty much without interference from common people, as long as they don't come to our house and try to mess with us in person - then we may speak up, but no one will hear or do much about it. Just another unfortunate event...

If you are one of those who fell for the propaganda (and I don't blame you, it's cleverly set up so that you will), give the following a thought: if humankind are a bloodthirsty creatures, whose main purpose is to rule and conquer by killing opponents, why are you basically thinking that is wrong? Even if you say that it's all unfortunate, but still human nature, is it your nature too? Most of us would say 'no' to this, so isn't that enough to make us think that there are things we don't know here? Things that are hidden from us?

I am not saying you shouldn't read history books and learn from them. We all should, but it is also all our responsibility to research outside class to try to find the "missing data", the "hidden truth", the pieces of the puzzle that were not laid in class. This is very important if we want the current world situation to change to the better; we can't change something we don't understand. Now, when we have the Internet and access to so many more sources, it is also much easier for each individual to find material to study- and it's often free of charge. It doesn't mean it's easy to separate the weed, but it's probably easier than it ever was.

The truth of the matter is, and this is my point, that old history events that seem to be unrelated are actually related. What does Alexander have in common with Caesar, like Napoleon with Hitler, and Hitler with Bush? If you read the history books only, the answer would be: nothing, except that they all wanted to conquer the world, apparently for slightly different reasons. But if you look beyond that and do your homework, you will notice that they do have a lot in common, they just lived in different times. They all had world conquest in mind and they all were mystics in one way or another. If you look into it, they were all connected to Mystery Religions, so called Secret Societies, and these Secret Societies have one thing in common - world conquest! Even Bush has his "Skull & Bones" membership - same old Mystery Religion.

The conquerors of the past failed to conquer the WHOLE world because they were stopped somewhere along the way, whether it was because of successful resistance, assassination of the conqueror, fatal illness of the same, or otherwise, but both Alexander and Caesar were doing pretty good in the respect of world conquest, making great attempts, taking into consideration the times they were living in. They didn't have nuclear weapons or global transportation or space technology. Still they conquered an enormous part of the ancient world! And we think it can't be done today when we have so much more technology? The problem is that many more people will die than in ancient times because of the power of today's weapons. But what I want to bring to mind is that "conquering the world" is a very old goal of those top Secret Societies that have been around at least since the Neolithic Period when the old Sumerian culture came to rise, and if we don't understand this, a few power-hungry bloodlines will eventually either take over, or utterly destroy our planet and the future for our children and grandchildren.

The reason this has been allowed to go on for millennia is that the source of the destruction was never known. It is known now, and this is the time to stop these people, once and for all. And we have to teach our children what is behind this destruction, imperialism, and power hunger, and it has to be written down for future generations so this can not happen again. We need to ban societies with secret levels of initiation, because most of them have a 'secret agenda' that is not to the benefit for the many. I say "most of them", because some people may argue that there can be good secret societies that keep things secret because they plot to SAVE the world; with other words they work for the benefit of mankind. I am sure these groups exist and have existed behind the scenes for a long time, but once we have banned all secret societies, the "good ones" are not needed either, are they?

The conclusion here is that it is all our responsibility to research what is behind Globalization and what the end goal is, otherwise they may actually succeed this time, and even if they don't, with the nuclear powers they have today, they may as a last resort destroy the whole planet.

I am an advocate for "knowledge is power" and I believe that if we educate ourselves, this insanity can be stopped!