Will it
matter if
Obama or
McCain are
elected in
November?
Hardly.
Both are rigidly backed by important members of the Trilateral Commission who hijacked the Executive Branch of the U.S. government starting in 1976 with the election of Jimmy Carter.
In Obama’s case, Zbigniew Brzezinski (co-founder of the Commission in 1973) is emerging as his principal advisor on foreign policy. Ex-Fed Chairman Paul Volker has made a once-in-a-lifetime, glowing endorsement of Obama. Madelyn Albright is seen sitting next to Obama in several conferences. Shoot, even Jimmy Carter himself endorses Obama. All are top members of the Commission.
John McCain is being supported by several Trilateral Commission giants including: Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Lawrence Eagleburger and Alexander Haig. All of these are ex-Secretaries of State who issued a joint endorsement of McCain early-on in his campaign.
And, unless Obama shoots both of his own feet (or…?) before the general presidential election in November, he is most likely to be the next president of the United States.
You would think that Americans would want to know who the “special interests” are that are embodied by this Trilateral Commission, and what they intend to do or not do with America.
What is the Trilateral Commission?
The
Trilateral
Commission
was founded
by the
persistent
maneuvering
of David
Rockefeller
and Zbigniew
Brzezinski
in 1973.
Rockefeller
was chairman
of the
ultra-powerful
Chase
Manhattan
Bank, a
director of
many major
multinational
corporations
and
"endowment
funds" and
had long
been
a
central
figure in
the Council
on Foreign
Relations (CFR).
Brzezinski,
a brilliant
prognosticator
of one-world
idealism,
was a
professor at
Columbia
University
and the
author of
several
books that
have served
as "policy
guidelines"
for the
Trilateral
Commission.
Brzezinski served as the Commission's first executive director from its inception in 1973 until late 1976 when he was appointed by President Jimmy Carter as Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
The initial Commission membership was approximately three hundred, with roughly one hundred each from Europe, Japan and North America. Membership was also roughly divided between academics, politicians and corporate magnates; these included international bankers, leaders of prominent labor unions and corporate directors of media giants.
The word commission was puzzling since it is usually associated with instrumentalities set up by governments. It seemed out of place with a so-called private group unless we could determine that it really was an arm of a government - an unseen government, different from the visible government in Washington. European and Japanese involvement indicated a world government rather than a national government. We hoped that the concept of a sub-rosa world government was just wishful thinking on the part of the Trilateral Commissioners. The facts, however, lined up quite pessimistically.
If the Council on Foreign Relations could be said to be a spawning ground for the concepts of one-world idealism, then the Trilateral Commission was the "task force" assembled to assault the beachheads. Already the Commission had placed its members in the top posts the U.S. had to offer.
Jimmy Carter: The first Trilateral president
President
James Earl
Carter, the
country
politician
who
promised, "I
will never
lie to you,"
was chosen
to join the
Commission
by
Brzezinski
in 1973. It
was
Brzezinski,
in fact, who
first
identified
Carter as
presidential
timber, and
subsequently
educated him
in
economics,
foreign
policy, and
the
ins-and-outs
of world
politics.
Upon
Carter's
election,
Brzezinski
was
appointed
assistant to
the
president
for national
security
matters.
Commonly, he
was called
the head of
the National
Security
Council
because he
answered
only to the
president -
some said
Brzezinski
held the
second most
powerful
position in
the U.S.
Carter's
running
mate, Walter
Mondale, was
also a
member of
the
Commission.
(If you are
trying to
calculate
the odds of
three
virtually
unknown men,
out of over
sixty
Commissioners
from the
U.S.,
capturing
the three
most
powerful
positions in
the land,
don't
bother. Your
calculations
will be
meaningless.)
On January 7, 1977 Time Magazine, whose editor-in-chief, Hedley Donovan was a powerful Trilateral, named President Carter "Man of the Year." The sixteen-page article in that issue not only failed to mention Carter's connection with the Commission but also stated the following:
“As he searched for Cabinet appointees, Carter seemed at times hesitant and frustrated disconcertingly out of character. His lack of ties to Washington and the Party Establishment - qualities that helped raise him to the White House - carry potential dangers. He does not know the Federal Government or the pressures it creates. He does not really know the politicians whom he will need to help him run the country.”
Was this portrait of Carter as a political innocent simply inaccurate or was it deliberately misleading? By December 25, 1976 - two weeks before the Time article appeared - Carter had already chosen his cabinet. Three of his cabinet members – Cyrus Vance, Michael Blumenthal, and Harold Brown - were Trilateral Commissioners; and the other non-Commission members were not unsympathetic to Commission objectives and operations. In addition, Carter had appointed another fourteen Trilateral Commissioners to top government posts, including:
C. Fred Bergsten (Under Secretary of Treasury)
James Schlesinger (Secretary of Energy)
Elliot Richardson (Delegate to Law of the Sea)
Leonard Woodcock (Chief envoy to China)
Andrew Young (Ambassador to the United Nations).
As of 25 December 1976, therefore, there were nineteen Trilaterals, including Carter and Mondale, holding tremendous political power. These presidential appointees represented almost one-third of the Trilateral Commission members from the United States. The odds of that happening “by chance” are beyond calculation!
Realities of the New World Order
In
1972,
Brzezinski's
wrote that
"nation-state
as a
fundamental
unit of
man's
organized
life has
ceased to be
the
principal
creative
force:
International
banks and
multinational
corporations
are acting
and planning
in terms
that are far
in advance
of the
political
concepts of
the
nation-state."
The late
Senator
Barry
Goldwater
(R-AZ) was
one of a
very few
people who
understood
what
Brzezinski
was alluding
to, when he
issued a
clear and
precise
warning in
his 1979
book, With
No
Apologies:
“The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.”
Trilateral Entrenchment: 1980-2008
Every Administration since Carter has had top-level Trilateral Commission representation through the President or Vice-President, or both! George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Dick Cheney are all members.
In turn, these have appointed their Trilateral cronies to top positions in their Administrations.
For instance, six out of seven World Bank presidents have been members of the Commission. Eight out of ten USTR’s (U.S. Trade Representative) have been members.
Secretaries of State include Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Alexander Haig, George Schultz, Lawrence Eagleburger, Warren Christopher and Madeleine Albright. Yep, all members of the Trilateral Commission.
Follow the money, follow the power
You
decide which
is scarier:
Obama and
Brzezinski
or McCain
and Henry
Kissinger?
Either way, Americans will continue to lose…
Every major crisis we face today is directly attributable to policies put forth and executed by members of this Trilateral Commission: Banking/lending/mortgage crisis, energy/gas price crisis, food/shortage/price crisis.
In addition, in the last fifteen to twenty years we have lost of millions of prime manufacturing jobs to China, India and Mexico. Our prime assets are being purchased by sovereign wealth funds and foreign investors. Our currency has all but been destroyed throughout the world.
Remember Brzezinski's vision that "international banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state"?
Well, that’s been true enough. But, for all their acting and planning at the expense of our own prosperity and Sovereignty, who wants or needs more of the same under Obama or McCain? With friends like this, who needs enemies?
For several Presidential elections now, this writer has voted according to the philosophy of voting for the “lesser of two evils.” Never again!
A vote for
either Obama
or McCain is
a vote for
the complete
destruction
of America!
.jpg)
