Manifesto for World Dictatorship
by Margo Kingston, The Sydney Morning Herald,
Sep 22, 2002
Margo Kingston
ow we know. The Americans have spelt it out in
black and white. There will be a world
government, but not one even pretending to be
comprised of representatives of its nation
states through the United Nations. The United
States will rule, and not according to
painstakingly developed international law and
norms, but by what is in its interests.
In declaring itself dictator of the world, The
United States will have no accountability to
non-United States citizens. It will bomb who it
likes when it likes, and change regimes when and
as it sees fit, it will not be subject to
investigations for war crimes, for torture, or
for breaches of fundamental human rights.
When it asks the United Nations to move against
Iraq, it is not demanding agreement to a strong
case for action. It now admits it has no
evidence that Iraq is preapring to use weapons
of mass destruction against any other country.
The Americans have stopped pretending, and now
demand outright capitulation to its hegemony.
The world will be policed in American interests.
Full stop.
So now American history screams from background
discussion to the forefront of debate. The
Americans - despite their promises to be a
benevolent dictatorship, do not aim to build,
stabilise, and promote democracies. They aim to
impose puppets, and agree to Faustian deals
which brutalise and disempower citizens. They
pay no heed to the disastrous results of such
dictatorships when imposed in the past.
Australia's choice is to become a
non-enfranchised satellite state of the United
States - and thus responsible for its aggression
and a legitimate target for those fighting to
win back countries the Americans take by force,
or to fight like hell to save the United
Nation's dream of world government by
negotiation.
The United Nations itself - the dream of
multilateral solutions to problems only the
world acting together can solve, is on the brink
of collapse. This could be one hell of a debate,
and I can't see Labor going for American
unilateralism and the crushing of the UN. Yes,
it's true, much of the sentiment against United
State's behaviour is anti-American. It's also
pro-Australian, French, or whatever country you
feel you belong to.
The stunning New York Times scoop - publishing
President Bush's new national security strategy,
to be given to Congress - is a frightening
document. But as David Plumb said in
The Crusade's progress, "It is time to stop
being outraged by the directness and aggression
of realpolitic". What can the rest of the world
do?
THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY OF THE UNITED
STATES
Introduction
THE great struggles of the twentieth century
between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a
decisive victory for the forces of freedom - and
a single sustainable model for national success:
freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. In the
twenty-first century, only nations that share a
commitment to protecting basic human rights and
guaranteeing political and economic freedom will
be able to unleash the potential of their people
and assure their future prosperity. People
everywhere want to say what they think; choose
who will govern them; worship as they please;
educate their children - male and female; own
property; and enjoy the benefits of their labor.
These values of freedom are right and true for
every person, in every society - and the duty of
protecting these values against their enemies is
the common calling of freedom-loving people
across the globe and across the ages.
Today, the United States enjoys a position of
unparalleled military strength and great
economic and political influence. In keeping
with our heritage and principles, we do not use
our strength to press for unilateral advantage.
We seek instead to create a balance of power
that favors human freedom: conditions in which
all nations and all societies can choose for
themselves the rewards and challenges of
political and economic liberty. By making the
world safer, we allow the people of the world to
make their own lives better. We will defend this
just peace against threats from terrorists and
tyrants. We will preserve the peace by building
good relations among the great powers. We will
extend the peace by encouraging free and open
societies on every continent.
Defending our Nation against its enemies is the
first and fundamental commitment of the Federal
Government. Today, that task has changed
dramatically. Enemies in the past needed great
armies and great industrial capabilities to
endanger America. Now, shadowy networks of
individuals can bring great chaos and suffering
to our shores for less than it costs to purchase
a single tank. Terrorists are organized to
penetrate open societies and to turn the power
of modern technologies against us.
To defeat this threat we must make use of every
tool in our arsenal - from better homeland
defenses and law enforcement to intelligence and
cutting off terrorist financing. The war against
terrorists of global reach is a global
enterprise of uncertain duration. America will
help nations that need our assistance in
combating terror. And America will hold to
account nations that are compromised by terror -
because the allies of terror are the enemies of
civilization. The United States and countries
cooperating with us must not allow the
terrorists to develop new home bases. Together,
we will seek to deny them sanctuary at every
turn.
The gravest danger our Nation faces lies at the
crossroads of radicalism and technology. Our
enemies have openly declared that they are
seeking weapons of mass destruction, and
evidence indicates that they are doing so with
determination. The United States will not allow
these efforts to succeed. We will build defenses
against ballistic missiles and other means of
delivery. We will cooperate with other nations
to deny, contain, and curtail our enemies'
efforts to acquire dangerous technologies. And,
as a matter of common sense and self-defense,
America will act against such emerging threats
before they are fully formed. We cannot defend
America and our friends by hoping for the best.
So we must be prepared to defeat our enemies'
plans, using the best intelligence and
proceeding with deliberation. History will judge
harshly those who saw this coming danger but
failed to act. In the new world we have entered,
the only path to safety is the path of action.
As we defend the peace, we will also take
advantage of an historic opportunity to preserve
the peace. Today, the international community
has the best chance since the rise of the
nation-state in the seventeenth century to build
a world where great powers compete in peace
instead of continually prepare for war. Today,
the world's great powers find ourselves on the
same side -- united by common dangers of
terrorist violence and chaos. The United States
will build on these common interests to promote
global security. We are also increasingly united
by common values. Russia is in the midst of a
hopeful transition, reaching for its democratic
future and a partner in the war on terror.
Chinese leaders are discovering that economic
freedom is the only source of national wealth.
In time, they will find that social and
political freedom is the only source of national
greatness. America will encourage the
advancement of democracy and economic openness
in both nations, because these are the best
foundations for domestic stability and
international order. We will strongly resist
aggression from other great powers - even as we
welcome their peaceful pursuit of prosperity,
trade, and cultural advancement.
Finally, the United States will use this moment
of opportunity to extend the benefits of freedom
across the globe. We will actively work to bring
the hope of democracy, development, free
markets, and free trade to every corner of the
world. The events of September 11, 2001, taught
us that weak states, like Afghanistan, can pose
as great a danger to our national interests as
strong states. Poverty does not make poor people
into terrorists and murderers. Yet poverty, weak
institutions, and corruption can make weak
states vulnerable to terrorist networks and drug
cartels within their borders.
The United States will stand beside any nation
determined to build a better future by seeking
the rewards of liberty for its people. Free
trade and free markets have proven their ability
to lift whole societies out of poverty -- so the
United States will work with individual nations,
entire regions, and the entire global trading
community to build a world that trades in
freedom and therefore grows in prosperity. The
United States will deliver greater development
assistance through the New Millennium Challenge
Account to nations that govern justly, invest in
their people, and encourage economic freedom. We
will also continue to lead the world in efforts
to reduce the terrible toll of AIDS and other
infectious diseases.
In building a balance of power that favors
freedom, the United States is guided by the
conviction that all nations have important
responsibilities. Nations that enjoy freedom
must actively fight terror. Nations that depend
on international stability must help prevent the
spread of weapons of mass destruction. Nations
that seek international aid must govern
themselves wisely, so that aid is well spent.
For freedom to thrive, accountability must be
expected and required.
We are also guided by the conviction that no
nation can build a safer, better world alone.
Alliances and multilateral institutions can
multiply the strength of freedom-loving nations.
The United States is committed to lasting
institutions like the United Nations, the World
Trade Organization, the Organization of American
States, and NATO as well as other long-standing
alliances. Coalitions of the willing can augment
these permanent institutions. In all cases,
international obligations are to be taken
seriously. They are not to be undertaken
symbolically to rally support for an ideal
without furthering its attainment.
Freedom is the non-negotiable demand of human
dignity; the birthright of every person - in
every civilization. Throughout history, freedom
has been threatened by war and terror; it has
been challenged by the clashing wills of
powerful states and the evil designs of tyrants;
and it has been tested by widespread poverty and
disease. Today, humanity holds in its hands the
opportunity to further freedom's triumph over
all these foes. The United States welcomes our
responsibility to lead in this great mission.
I. Overview of America's International
Strategy
"Our Nation's cause has always been larger
than our Nation's defense. We fight, as we
always fight, for a just peace - a peace that
favors liberty. We will defend the peace against
the threats from terrorists and tyrants. We will
preserve the peace by building good relations
among the great powers. And we will extend
the peace by encouraging free and open societies
on every continent." President Bush, West Point,
New York. June 1, 2002
The United States possesses unprecedented - and
unequaled - strength and influence in the world.
Sustained by faith in the principles of liberty,
and the value of a free society, this position
comes with unparalleled responsibilities,
obligations, and opportunity. The great strength
of this nation must be used to promote a balance
of power that favors freedom.
For most of the twentieth century, the world was
divided by a great struggle over ideas:
destructive totalitarian visions versus freedom
and equality.
That great struggle is over. The militant
visions of class, nation, and race which
promised utopia and delivered misery have been
defeated and discredited. America is now
threatened less by conquering states than we are
by failing ones. We are menaced less by fleets
and armies than by catastrophic technologies in
the hands of the embittered few. We must defeat
these threats to our Nation, allies, and
friends.
This is also a time of opportunity for America.
We will work to translate this moment of
influence into decades of peace, prosperity, and
liberty. The U.S. national security strategy
will be based on a distinctly American
internationalism that reflects the union of our
values and our national interests. The aim of
this strategy is to help make the world not just
safer but better. Our goals on the path to
progress are clear: political and economic
freedom, peaceful relations with other states,
and respect for human dignity.
And this path is not America's alone. It is open
to all.
To achieve these goals, the United States will:
* champion aspirations for human dignity;
* strengthen alliances to defeat global
terrorism and work to prevent attacks against us
and our friends;
* work with others to defuse regional conflicts;
* prevent our enemies from threatening us, our
allies, and our friends, with weapons of mass
destruction;
* ignite a new era of global economic growth
through free markets and free trade;
* expand the circle of development by opening
societies and building the infrastructure of
democracy;
* develop agendas for cooperative action with
other main centers of global power; and
* transform America's national security
institutions to meet the challenges and
opportunities of the twenty-first century.
II. Champion Aspirations for Human Dignity
"Some worry that it is somehow undiplomatic
or impolite to speak the language of right and
wrong. I disagree. Different circumstances
require different methods, but not different
moralities." President Bush, West Point, New
York, June 1, 2002
In pursuit of our goals, our first imperative is
to clarify what we stand for: the United States
must defend liberty and justice because these
principles are right and true for all people
everywhere. No nation owns these aspirations,
and no nation is exempt from them. Fathers and
mothers in all societies want their children to
be educated and to live free from poverty and
violence. No people on earth yearn to be
oppressed, aspire to servitude, or eagerly await
the midnight knock of the secret police.
America must stand firmly for the nonnegotiable
demands of human dignity: the rule of law;
limits on the absolute power of the state; free
speech; freedom of worship; equal justice;
respect for women; religious and ethnic
tolerance; and respect for private property.
These demands can be met in many ways. America's
constitution has served us well. Many other
nations, with different histories and cultures,
facing different circumstances, have
successfully incorporated these core principles
into their own systems of governance. History
has not been kind to those nations which ignored
or flouted the rights and aspirations of their
people.
Our own history is a long struggle to live up to
our ideals. But even in our worst moments, the
principles enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence were there to guide us. As a
result, America is not just a stronger, but is a
freer and more just society.
Today, these ideals are a lifeline to lonely
defenders of liberty. And when openings arrive,
we can encourage change - as we did in central
and eastern Europe between 1989 and 1991, or in
Belgrade in 2000. When we see democratic
processes take hold among our friends in Taiwan
or in the Republic of Korea, and see elected
leaders replace generals in Latin America and
Africa, we see examples of how authoritarian
systems can evolve, marrying local history and
traditions with the principles we all cherish.
Embodying lessons from our past and using the
opportunity we have today, the national security
strategy of the United States must start from
these core beliefs and look outward for
possibilities to expand liberty.
Our principles will guide our government's
decisions about international cooperation, the
character of our foreign assistance, and the
allocation of resources. They will guide our
actions and our words in international bodies.
We will:
* speak out honestly about violations of the
nonnegotiable demands of human dignity using our
voice and vote in international institutions to
advance freedom;
* use our foreign aid to promote freedom and
support those who struggle non-violently for it,
ensuring that nations moving toward democracy
are rewarded for the steps they take;
* make freedom and the development of democratic
institutions key themes in our bilateral
relations, seeking solidarity and cooperation
from other democracies while we press
governments that deny human rights to move
toward a better future; and
* take special efforts to promote freedom of
religion and conscience and defend it from
encroachment by repressive governments.
We will champion the cause of human dignity and
oppose those who resist it.
III. Strengthen Alliances to Defeat Global
Terrorism and Work to Prevent Attacks Against Us
and Our Friends
"Just three days removed from these events,
Americans do not yet have the distance of
history. But our responsibility to history is
already clear: to answer these attacks and rid
the world of evil. War has been waged against us
by stealth and deceit and murder. This nation is
peaceful, but fierce when stirred to anger. The
conflict was begun on the timing and terms of
others. It will end in a way, and at an hour, of
our choosing." President Bush, Washington,
D.C. (The National Cathedral) September 14, 2001
The United States of America is fighting a war
against terrorists of global reach. The enemy is
not a single political regime or person or
religion or ideology. The enemy is terrorism -
premeditated, politically motivated violence
perpetrated against innocents.
In many regions, legitimate grievances prevent
the emergence of a lasting peace. Such
grievances deserve to be, and must be, addressed
within a political process. But no cause
justifies terror. The United States will make no
concessions to terrorist demands and strike no
deals with them. We make no distinction between
terrorists and those who knowingly harbor or
provide aid to them.
The struggle against global terrorism is
different from any other war in our history. It
will be fought on many fronts against a
particularly elusive enemy over an extended
period of time. Progress will come through the
persistent accumulation of successes - some
seen, some unseen.
Today our enemies have seen the results of what
civilized nations can, and will, do against
regimes that harbor, support, and use terrorism
to achieve their political goals. Afghanistan
has been liberated; coalition forces continue to
hunt down the Taliban and al-Qaida. But it is
not only this battlefield on which we will
engage terrorists. Thousands of trained
terrorists remain at large with cells in North
America, South America, Europe, Africa, the
Middle East, and across Asia.
Our priority will be first to disrupt and
destroy terrorist organizations of global reach
and attack their leadership; command, control,
and communications; material support; and
finances. This will have a disabling effect upon
the terrorists' ability to plan and operate.
We will continue to encourage our regional
partners to take up a coordinated effort that
isolates the terrorists. Once the regional
campaign localizes the threat to a particular
state, we will help ensure the state has the
military, law enforcement, political, and
financial tools necessary to finish the task.
The United States will continue to work with our
allies to disrupt the financing of terrorism. We
will identify and block the sources of funding
for terrorism, freeze the assets of terrorists
and those who support them, deny terrorists
access to the international financial system,
protect legitimate charities from being abused
by terrorists, and prevent the movement of
terrorists' assets through alternative financial
networks.
However, this campaign need not be sequential to
be effective, the cumulative effect across all
regions will help achieve the results we seek.
We will disrupt and destroy terrorist
organizations by:
* direct and continuous action using all the
elements of national and international power.
Our immediate focus will be those terrorist
organizations of global reach and any terrorist
or state sponsor of terrorism which attempts to
gain or use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or
their precursors;
* defending the United States, the American
people, and our interests at home and abroad by
identifying and destroying the threat before it
reaches our borders. While the United States
will constantly strive to enlist the support of
the international community, we will not
hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise
our right of self-defense by acting preemptively
against such terrorists, to prevent them from
doing harm against our people and our country;
and
* denying further sponsorship, support, and
sanctuary to terrorists by convincing or
compelling states to accept their sovereign
responsibilities.
We will also wage a war of ideas to win the
battle against international terrorism. This
includes:
* using the full influence of the United States,
and working closely with allies and friends, to
make clear that all acts of terrorism are
illegitimate so that terrorism will be viewed in
the same light as slavery, piracy, or genocide:
behavior that no respectable government can
condone or support and all must oppose;
* supporting moderate and modern government,
especially in the Muslim world, to ensure that
the conditions and ideologies that promote
terrorism do not find fertile ground in any
nation;
* diminishing the underlying conditions that
spawn terrorism by enlisting the international
community to focus its efforts and resources on
areas most at risk; and
* using effective public diplomacy to promote
the free flow of information and ideas to kindle
the hopes and aspirations of freedom of those in
societies ruled by the sponsors of global
terrorism.
While we recognize that our best defense is a
good offense we are also strengthening America's
homeland security to protect against and deter
attack.
This Administration has proposed the largest
government reorganization since the Truman
Administration created the National Security
Council and the Department of Defense. Centered
on a new Department of Homeland Security and
including a new unified military command and a
fundamental reordering of the FBI, our
comprehensive plan to secure the homeland
encompasses every level of government and the
cooperation of the public and the private
sector.
This strategy will turn adversity into
opportunity. For example, emergency management
systems will be better able to cope not just
with terrorism but with all hazards. Our medical
system will be strengthened to manage not just
bioterror, but all infectious diseases and
mass-casualty dangers. Our border controls will
not just stop terrorists, but improve the
efficient movement of legitimate traffic.
While our focus is protecting America, we know
that to defeat terrorism in today's globalized
world we need support from our allies and
friends. Wherever possible, the United States
will rely on regional organizations and state
powers to meet their obligations to fight
terrorism. Where governments find the fight
against terrorism beyond their capacities, we
will match their willpower and their resources
with whatever help we and our allies can
provide.
As we pursue the terrorists in Afghanistan, we
will continue to work with international
organizations such as the United Nations, as
well as non-governmental organizations, and
other countries to provide the humanitarian,
political, economic, and security assistance
necessary to rebuild Afghanistan so that it will
never again abuse its people, threaten its
neighbors, and provide a haven for terrorists
In the war against global terrorism, we will
never forget that we are ultimately fighting for
our democratic values and way of life. Freedom
and fear are at war, and there will be no quick
or easy end to this conflict. In leading the
campaign against terrorism, we are forging new,
productive international relationships and
redefining existing ones in ways that meet the
challenges of the twenty-first century.
IV. Work with Others To Defuse Regional
Conflicts
"We build a world of justice, or we will live
in a world of coercion. The magnitude of our
shared responsibilities makes our disagreements
look so small." President Bush, Berlin,
Germany, May 23, 2002
Concerned nations must remain actively engaged
in critical regional disputes to avoid explosive
escalation and minimize human suffering. In an
increasingly interconnected world, regional
crisis can strain our alliances, rekindle
rivalries among the major powers, and create
horrifying affronts to human dignity. When
violence erupts and states falter, the United
States will work with friends and partners to
alleviate suffering and restore stability.
No doctrine can anticipate every circumstance in
which U.S. action - direct or indirect - is
warranted. We have finite political, economic,
and military resources to meet our global
priorities. The United States will approach each
case with these strategic principles in mind:
The United States should invest time and
resources into building international
relationships and institutions that can help
manage local crises when they emerge.
The United States should be realistic about its
ability to help those who are unwilling or
unready to help themselves. Where and when
people are ready to do their part, we will be
willing to move decisively.
Policies in several key regions offer some
illustrations of how we will apply these
principles:
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is critical
because of the toll of human suffering, because
of America's close relationship with the state
of Israel and key Arab states, and because of
that region's importance to other global
priorities of the United States. There can be no
peace for either side without freedom for both
sides. America stands committed to an
independent and democratic Palestine, living
beside Israel in peace and security. Like all
other people, Palestinians deserve a government
that serves their interests, and listens to
their voices, and counts their votes. The United
States will continue to encourage all parties to
step up to their responsibilities as we seek a
just and comprehensive settlement to the
conflict.
The United States, the international donor
community, and the World Bank stand ready to
work with a reformed Palestinian government on
economic development, increased humanitarian
assistance and a program to establish, finance,
and monitor a truly independent judiciary. If
Palestinians embrace democracy, and the rule of
law, confront corruption, and firmly reject
terror, they can count on American support for
the creation of a Palestinian state.
Israel also has a large stake in the success of
a democratic Palestine. Permanent occupation
threatens Israel's identity and democracy. So
the United States continues to challenge Israeli
leaders to take concrete steps to support the
emergence of a viable, credible Palestinian
state. As there is progress towards security,
Israel forces need to withdraw fully to
positions they held prior to September 28, 2000.
And consistent with the recommendations of the
Mitchell Committee, Israeli settlement activity
in the occupied territories must stop. As
violence subsides, freedom of movement should be
restored, permitting innocent Palestinians to
resume work and normal life. The United States
can play a crucial role but, ultimately, lasting
peace can only come when Israelis and
Palestinians resolve the issues and end the
conflict between them.
In South Asia, the United States has also
emphasized the need for India and Pakistan to
resolve their disputes. This administration
invested time and resources building strong
bilateral relations with India and Pakistan.
These strong relations then gave us leverage to
play a constructive role when tensions in the
region became acute. With Pakistan, our
bilateral relations have been bolstered by
Pakistan's choice to join the war against terror
and move toward building a more open and
tolerant society. The Administration sees
India's potential to become one of the great
democratic powers of the twenty-first century
and has worked hard to transform our
relationship accordingly. Our involvement in
this regional dispute, building on earlier
investments in bilateral relations, looks first
to concrete steps by India and Pakistan that can
help defuse military confrontation.
Indonesia took courageous steps to create a
working democracy and respect for the rule of
law. By tolerating ethnic minorities, respecting
the rule of law, and accepting open markets,
Indonesia may be able to employ the engine of
opportunity that has helped lift some of its
neighbors out of poverty and desperation. It is
the initiative by Indonesia that allows U.S.
assistance to make a difference.
In the Western Hemisphere we have formed
flexible coalitions with countries that share
our priorities, particularly Mexico, Brazil,
Canada, Chile, and Colombia. Together we will
promote a truly democratic hemisphere where our
integration advances security, prosperity,
opportunity, and hope. We will work with
regional institutions, such as the Summit of the
Americas process, the Organization of American
States (OAS), and the Defense Ministerial of the
Americas for the benefit of the entire
hemisphere.
Parts of Latin America confront regional
conflict, especially arising from the violence
of drug cartels and their accomplices. This
conflict and unrestrained narcotics trafficking
could imperil the health and security of the
United States. Therefore we have developed an
active strategy to help the Andean nations
adjust their economies, enforce their laws,
defeat terrorist organizations, and cut off the
supply of drugs, while - as important - we work
to reduce the demand for drugs in our own
country.
In Colombia, we recognize the link between
terrorist and extremist groups that challenge
the security of the state and drug trafficking
activities that help finance the operations of
such groups. We are working to help Colombia
defend its democratic institutions and defeat
illegal armed groups of both the left and right
by extending effective sovereignty over the
entire national territory and provide basic
security to the Colombian people.
In Africa, promise and opportunity sit side by
side with disease, war, and desperate poverty.
This threatens both a core value of the United
States - preserving human dignity - and our
strategic priority -- combating global terror.
American interests and American principles,
therefore, lead in the same direction: we will
work with others for an African continent that
lives in liberty, peace, and growing prosperity.
Together with our European allies, we must help
strengthen Africa's fragile states, help build
indigenous capability to secure porous borders,
and help build up the law enforcement and
intelligence infrastructure to deny havens for
terrorists.
An ever more lethal environment exists in Africa
as local civil wars spread beyond borders to
create regional war zones. Forming coalitions of
the willing and cooperative security
arrangements are key to confronting these
emerging transnational threats.
Africa's great size and diversity requires a
security strategy that focuses bilateral
engagement, and builds coalitions of the
willing. This administration will focus on three
interlocking strategies for the region:
* countries with major impact on their
neighborhood such as South Africa, Nigeria,
Kenya, and Ethiopia are anchors for regional
engagement and require focused attention;
* coordination with European allies and
international institutions is essential for
constructive conflict mediation and successful
peace operations; and
* Africa's capable reforming states and
sub-regional organizations must be strengthened
as the primary means to address transnational
threats on a sustained basis.
Ultimately the path of political and economic
freedom presents the surest route to progress in
sub-Saharan Africa, where most wars are
conflicts over material resources and political
access often tragically waged on the basis of
ethnic and religious difference. The transition
to the African Union with its stated commitment
to good governance and a common responsibility
for democratic political systems offers
opportunities to strengthen democracy on the
continent.
V. Prevent Our Enemies from Threatening Us,
Our Allies, and Our Friends with Weapons of Mass
Destruction
"The gravest danger to freedom lies at the
crossroads of radicalism and technology. When
the spread of chemical and biological and
nuclear weapons, along with ballistic missile
technology -- when that occurs, even weak states
and small groups could attain a catastrophic
power to strike great nations. Our enemies have
declared this very intention, and have been
caught seeking these terrible weapons. They want
the capability to blackmail us, or to harm us,
or to harm our friends -- and we will oppose
them with all our power." President Bush,
West Point, New York, June 1, 2002
The nature of the Cold War threat required the
United States - with our allies and friends - to
emphasize deterrence of the enemy's use of
force, producing a grim strategy of mutual
assured destruction. With the collapse of the
Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, our
security environment has undergone profound
transformation.
Having moved from confrontation to cooperation
as the hallmark of our relationship with Russia,
the dividends are evident: an end to the balance
of terror that divided us; an historic reduction
in the nuclear arsenals on both sides; and
cooperation in areas such as counterterrorism
and missile defense that until recently were
inconceivable.
But new deadly challenges have emerged from
rogue states and terrorists. None of these
contemporary threats rival the sheer destructive
power that was arrayed against us by the Soviet
Union. However, the nature and motivations of
these new adversaries, their determination to
obtain destructive powers hitherto available
only to the world's strongest states, and the
greater likelihood that they will use weapons of
mass destruction against us, make today's
security environment more complex and dangerous.
In the 1990s we witnessed the emergence of a
small number of rogue states that, while
different in important ways, share a number of
attributes. These states:
* brutalize their own people and squander their
national resources for the personal gain of the
rulers;
* display no regard for international law,
threaten their neighbors, and callously violate
international treaties to which they are party;
* are determined to acquire weapons of mass
destruction, along with other advanced military
technology, to be used as threats or offensively
to achieve the aggressive designs of these
regimes;
* sponsor terrorism around the globe; and
* reject basic human values and hate the United
States and everything for which it stands.
At the time of the Gulf War, we acquired
irrefutable proof that Iraq's designs were not
limited to the chemical weapons it had used
against Iran and its own people, but also
extended to the acquisition of nuclear weapons
and biological agents. In the past decade North
Korea has become the world's principal purveyor
of ballistic missiles, and has tested
increasingly capable missiles while developing
its own WMD arsenal. Other rogue regimes seek
nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons as
well. These states' pursuit of, and global trade
in, such weapons has become a looming threat to
all nations.
We must be prepared to stop rogue states and
their terrorist clients before they are able to
threaten or use weapons of mass destruction
against the United States and our allies and
friends. Our response must take full advantage
of strengthened alliances, the establishment of
new partnerships with former adversaries,
innovation in the use of military forces, modern
technologies, including the development of an
effective missile defense system, and increased
emphasis on intelligence collection and
analysis.
Our comprehensive strategy to combat WMD
includes:
* Proactive counterproliferation efforts. We
must deter and defend against the threat before
it is unleashed. We must ensure that key
capabilities -- detection, active and passive
defenses, and counterforce capabilities -- are
integrated into our defense transformation and
our homeland security systems.
Counterproliferation must also be integrated
into the doctrine, training, and equipping of
our forces and those of our allies to ensure
that we can prevail in any conflict with
WMD-armed adversaries.
* Strengthened nonproliferation efforts to
prevent rogue states and terrorists from
acquiring the materials, technologies and
expertise necessary for weapons of mass
destruction. We will enhance diplomacy, arms
control, multilateral export controls, and
threat reduction assistance that impede states
and terrorists seeking WMD, and when necessary,
interdict enabling technologies and materials.
We will continue to build coalitions to support
these efforts, encouraging their increased
political and financial support for
nonproliferation and threat reduction programs.
The recent G-8 agreement to commit up to $20
billion to a global partnership against
proliferation marks a major step forward.
* Effective consequence management to respond to
the effects of WMD use, whether by terrorists or
hostile states. Minimizing the effects of WMD
use against our people will help deter those who
possess such weapons and dissuade those who seek
to acquire them by persuading enemies that they
cannot attain their desired ends. The United
States must also be prepared to respond to the
effects of WMD use against our forces abroad,
and to help friends and allies if they are
attacked.
It has taken almost a decade for us to
comprehend the true nature of this new threat.
Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists,
the United States can no longer solely rely on a
reactive posture as we have in the past. The
inability to deter a potential attacker, the
immediacy of today's threats, and the magnitude
of potential harm that could be caused by our
adversaries' choice of weapons, do not permit
that option. We cannot let our enemies strike
first.
In the Cold War, especially following the Cuban
missile crisis, we faced a generally status quo,
risk-averse adversary. Deterrence was an
effective defense. But deterrence based only
upon the threat of retaliation is far less
likely to work against leaders of rogue states
more willing to take risks, gambling with the
lives of their people, and the wealth of their
nations.
In the Cold War, weapons of mass destruction
were considered weapons of last resort whose use
risked the destruction of those who used them.
Today, our enemies see weapons of mass
destruction as weapons of choice. For rogue
states these weapons are tools of intimidation
and military aggression against their neighbors.
These weapons may also allow these states to
attempt to blackmail the United States and our
allies to prevent us from deterring or repelling
the aggressive behavior of rogue states. Such
states also see these weapons as their best
means of overcoming the conventional superiority
of the United States.
Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work
against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics
are wanton destruction and the targeting of
innocents; whose so-called soldiers seek
martyrdom in death and whose most potent
protection is statelessness. The overlap between
states that sponsor terror and those that pursue
WMD compels us to action.
For centuries, international law recognized that
nations need not suffer an attack before they
can lawfully take action to defend themselves
against forces that present an imminent danger
of attack. Legal scholars and international
jurists often conditioned the legitimacy of
preemption on the existence of an imminent
threat -- most often a visible mobilization of
armies, navies, and air forces preparing to
attack.
We must adapt the concept of imminent threat to
the capabilities and objectives of today's
adversaries. Rogue states and terrorists do not
seek to attack us using conventional means. They
know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely
on acts of terrorism and, potentially, the use
of weapons of mass destruction - weapons that
can be easily concealed and delivered covertly
and without warning.
The targets of these attacks are our military
forces and our civilian population, in direct
violation of one of the principal norms of the
law of warfare. As was demonstrated by the
losses on September 11, 2001, mass civilian
casualties is the specific objective of
terrorists and these losses would be
exponentially more severe if terrorists acquired
and used weapons of mass destruction.
The United States has long maintained the option
of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient
threat to our national security. The greater the
threat, the greater is the risk of inaction --
and the more compelling the case for taking
anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if
uncertainty remains as to the time and place of
the enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such
hostile acts by our adversaries, the United
States will, if necessary, act preemptively.
The United States will not use force in all
cases to preempt emerging threats, nor should
nations use preemption as a pretext for
aggression. Yet in an age where the enemies of
civilization openly and actively seek the
world's most destructive technologies, the
United States cannot remain idle while dangers
gather.
We will always proceed deliberately, weighing
the consequences of our actions. To support
preemptive options, we will:
* build better, more integrated intelligence
capabilities to provide timely, accurate
information on threats, wherever they may
emerge;
* coordinate closely with allies to form a
common assessment of the most dangerous threats;
and
* continue to transform our military forces to
ensure our ability to conduct rapid and precise
operations to achieve decisive results.
The purpose of our actions will always be to
eliminate a specific threat to the United States
or our allies and friends. The reasons for our
actions will be clear, the force measured, and
the cause just.
VI. Ignite a New Era of Global Economic
Growth through Free Markets and Free Trade.
"When nations close their markets and
opportunity is hoarded by a privileged few, no
amount -- no amount -- of development aid is
ever enough. When nations respect their people,
open markets, invest in better health and
education, every dollar of aid, every dollar of
trade revenue and domestic capital is used more
effectively." President Bush, Monterrey,
Mexico, March 22, 2002
A strong world economy enhances our national
security by advancing prosperity and freedom in
the rest of the world. Economic growth supported
by free trade and free markets creates new jobs
and higher incomes. It allows people to lift
their lives out of poverty, spurs economic and
legal reform, and the fight against corruption,
and it reinforces the habits of liberty.
We will promote economic growth and economic
freedom beyond America's shores. All governments
are responsible for creating their own economic
policies and responding to their own economic
challenge. We will use our economic engagement
with other countries to underscore the benefits
of policies that generate higher productivity
and sustained economic growth, including:
* pro-growth legal and regulatory policies to
encourage business investment, innovation, and
entrepreneurial activity;
* tax policies -- particularly lower marginal
tax rates -- that improve incentives for work
and investment;
* rule of law and intolerance of corruption so
that people are confident that they will be able
to enjoy the fruits of their economic endeavors;
* strong financial systems that allow capital to
be put to its most efficient use;
* sound fiscal policies to support business
activity;
* investments in health and education that
improve the well-being and skills of the labor
force and population as a whole; and
* free trade that provides new avenues for
growth and fosters the diffusion of technologies
and ideas that increase productivity and
opportunity.
The lessons of history are clear: market
economies, not command-and-control economies
with the heavy hand of government, are the best
way to promote prosperity and reduce poverty.
Policies that further strengthen market
incentives and market institutions are relevant
for all economies - industrialized countries,
emerging markets, and the developing world.
A return to strong economic growth in Europe and
Japan is vital to U.S. national security
interests. We want our allies to have strong
economies for their own sake, for the sake of
the global economy, and for the sake of global
security. European efforts to remove structural
barriers in their economies are particularly
important in this regard, as are Japan's efforts
to end deflation and address the problems of
non-performing loans in the Japanese banking
system. We will continue to use our regular
consultations with Japan and our European
partners - including through the Group of Seven
(G-7) - to discuss policies they are adopting to
promote growth in their economies and support
higher global economic growth.
Improving stability in emerging markets is also
key to global economic growth. International
flows of investment capital are needed to expand
the productive potential of these economies.
These flows allow emerging markets and
developing countries to make the investments
that raise living standards and reduce poverty.
Our long-term objective should be a world in
which all countries have investment-grade credit
ratings that allow them access to international
capital markets and to invest in their future.
We are committed to policies that will help
emerging markets achieve access to larger
capital flows at lower cost. To this end, we
will continue to pursue reforms aimed at
reducing uncertainty in financial markets. We
will work actively with other countries, the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the
private sector to implement the G-7 Action Plan
negotiated earlier this year for preventing
financial crises and more effectively resolving
them when they occur.
The best way to deal with financial crises is to
prevent them from occurring, and we have
encouraged the IMF to improve its efforts doing
so. We will continue to work with the IMF to
streamline the policy conditions for its lending
and to focus its lending strategy on achieving
economic growth through sound fiscal and
monetary policy, exchange rate policy, and
financial sector policy.
The concept of "free trade" arose as a moral
principle even before it became a pillar of
economics. If you can make something that others
value, you should be able to sell it to them. If
others make something that you value, you should
be able to buy it. This is real freedom, the
freedom for a person -- or a nation -- to make a
living. To promote free trade, the Unites States
has developed a comprehensive strategy:
* Seize the global initiative. The new global
trade negotiations we helped launch at Doha in
November 2001 will have an ambitious agenda,
especially in agriculture, manufacturing, and
services, targeted for completion in 2005. The
United States has led the way in completing the
accession of China and a democratic Taiwan to
the World Trade Organization. We will assist
Russia's preparations to join the WTO.
* Press regional initiatives. The United States
and other democracies in the Western Hemisphere
have agreed to create the Free Trade Area of the
Americas, targeted for completion in 2005. This
year the United States will advocate
market-access negotiations with its partners,
targeted on agriculture, industrial goods,
services, investment, and government
procurement. We will also offer more opportunity
to the poorest continent, Africa, starting with
full use of the preferences allowed in the
African Growth and Opportunity Act, and leading
to free trade.
* Move ahead with bilateral free trade
agreements. Building on the free trade agreement
with Jordan enacted in 2001, the Administration
will work this year to complete free trade
agreements with Chile and Singapore. Our aim is
to achieve free trade agreements with a mix of
developed and developing countries in all
regions of the world. Initially, Central
America, Southern Africa, Morocco, and Australia
will be our principal focal points.
* Renew the executive-congressional partnership.
Every administration's trade strategy depends on
a productive partnership with Congress. After a
gap of 8 years, the Administration reestablished
majority support in the Congress for trade
liberalization by passing Trade Promotion
Authority and the other market opening measures
for developing countries in the Trade Act of
2002. This Administration will work with
Congress to enact new bilateral, regional, and
global trade agreements that will be concluded
under the recently passed Trade Promotion
Authority.
* Promote the connection between trade and
development. Trade policies can help developing
countries strengthen property rights,
competition, the rule of law, investment, the
spread of knowledge, open societies, the
efficient allocation of resources, and regional
integration -- all leading to growth,
opportunity, and confidence in developing
countries. The United States is implementing The
Africa Growth and Opportunity Act to provide
market-access for nearly all goods produced in
the 35 countries of sub-Saharan Africa. We will
make more use of this act and its equivalent for
the Caribbean Basin and continue to work with
multilateral and regional institutions to help
poorer countries take advantage of these
opportunities. Beyond market access, the most
important area where trade intersects with
poverty is in public health. We will ensure that
the WTO intellectual property rules are flexible
enough to allow developing nations to gain
access to critical medicines for extraordinary
dangers like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and
malaria.
* Enforce trade agreements and laws against
unfair practices. Commerce depends on the rule
of law; international trade depends on
enforceable agreements. Our top priorities are
to resolve ongoing disputes with the European
Union, Canada, and Mexico and to make a global
effort to address new technology, science, and
health regulations that needlessly impede farm
exports and improved agriculture. Laws against
unfair trade practices are often abused, but the
international community must be able to address
genuine concerns about government subsidies and
dumping. International industrial espionage
which undermines fair competition must be
detected and deterred.
* Help domestic industries and workers adjust.
There is a sound statutory framework for these
transitional safeguards which we have used in
the agricultural sector and which we are using
this year to help the American steel industry.
The benefits of free trade depend upon the
enforcement of fair trading practices. These
safeguards help ensure that the benefits of free
trade do not come at the expense of American
workers. Trade adjustment assistance will help
workers adapt to the change and dynamism of open
markets.
* Protect the environment and workers. The
United States must foster economic growth in
ways that will provide a better life along with
widening prosperity. We will incorporate labor
and environmental concerns into U.S. trade
negotiations, creating a healthy "network"
between multilateral environmental agreements
with the WTO, and use the International Labor
Organization, trade preference programs, and
trade talks to improve working conditions in
conjunction with freer trade.
* Enhance energy security. We will strengthen
our own energy security and the shared
prosperity of the global economy by working with
our allies, trading partners, and energy
producers to expand the sources and types of
global energy supplied, especially in the
Western Hemisphere, Africa, Central Asia, and
the Caspian region. We will also continue to
work with our partners to develop cleaner and
more energy efficient technologies.
Economic growth should be accompanied by global
efforts to stabilize greenhouse gas
concentrations associated with this growth,
containing them at a level that prevents
dangerous human interference with the global
climate. Our overall objective is to reduce
America's greenhouse gas emissions relative to
the size of our economy, cutting such emissions
per unit of economic activity by 18 percent over
the next 10 years, by the year 2012. Our
strategies for attaining this goal will be to:
* remain committed to the basic U.N. Framework
Convention for international cooperation;
* obtain agreements with key industries to cut
emissions of some of the most potent greenhouse
gases and give transferable credits to companies
that can show real cuts;
* develop improved standards for measuring and
registering emission reductions;
* promote renewable energy production and clean
coal technology, as well as nuclear power --
which produces no greenhouse gas emissions,
while also improving fuel economy for U.S. cars
and trucks;
* increase spending on research and new
conservation technologies, to a total of $4.5
billion -- the largest sum being spent on
climate change by any country in the world and a
$700 million increase over last year's budget;
and
* assist developing countries, especially the
major greenhouse gas emitters such as China and
India, so that they will have the tools and
resources to join this effort and be able to
grow along a cleaner and better path.
VII. Expand the Circle of Development by Opening
Societies and Building the Infrastructure of
Democracy
"In World War II we fought to make the world
safer, then worked to rebuild it. As we wage war
today to keep the world safe from terror, we
must also work to make the world a better place
for all its citizens." President Bush,
Washington, D.C. (Inter-American Development
Bank) March 14, 2002
A world where some live in comfort and plenty,
while half of the human race lives on less than
$2 a day, is neither just nor stable. Including
all of the world's poor in an expanding circle
of development - and opportunity - is a moral
imperative and one of the top priorities of U.S.
international policy.
Decades of massive development assistance have
failed to spur economic growth in the poorest
countries. Worse, development aid has often
served to prop up failed policies, relieving the
pressure for reform and perpetuating misery.
Results of aid are typically measured in dollars
spent by donors, not in the rates of growth and
poverty reduction achieved by recipients. These
are the indicators of a failed strategy.
Working with other nations, the United States is
confronting this failure. We forged a new
consensus at the U.N. Conference on Financing
for Development in Monterrey that the objectives
of assistance - and the strategies to achieve
those objectives - must change.
This Administration's goal is to help unleash
the productive potential of individuals in all
nations. Sustained growth and poverty reduction
is impossible without the right national
policies. Where governments have implemented
real policy changes we will provide significant
new levels of assistance. The United States and
other developed countries should set an
ambitious and specific target: to double the
size of the world's poorest economies within a
decade.
The United States Government will pursue these
major strategies to achieve this goal:
* Provide resources to aid countries that have
met the challenge of national reform. We propose
a 50 percent increase in the core development
assistance given by the United States. While
continuing our present programs, including
humanitarian assistance based on need alone,
these billions of new dollars will form a new
Millennium Challenge Account for projects in
countries whose governments rule justly, invest
in their people, and encourage economic freedom.
Governments must fight corruption, respect basic
human rights, embrace the rule of law, invest in
health care and education, follow responsible
economic policies, and enable entrepreneurship.
The Millennium Challenge Account will reward
countries that have demonstrated real policy
change and challenge those that have not to
implement reforms.
* Improve the effectiveness of the World Bank
and other development banks in raising living
standards. The United States is committed to a
comprehensive reform agenda for making the World
Bank and the other multilateral development
banks more effective in improving the lives of
the world's poor. We have reversed the downward
trend in U.S. contributions and proposed an 18
percent increase in the U.S. contributions to
the International Development Association (IDA)
- the World Bank's fund for the poorest
countries - and the African Development Fund.
The key to raising living standards and reducing
poverty around the world is increasing
productivity growth, especially in the poorest
countries. We will continue to press the
multilateral development banks to focus on
activities that increase economic productivity,
such as improvements in education, health, rule
of law, and private sector development. Every
project, every loan, every grant must be judged
by how much it will increase productivity growth
in developing countries.
* Insist upon measurable results to ensure that
development assistance is actually making a
difference in the lives of the world's poor.
When it comes to economic development, what
really matters is that more children are getting
a better education, more people have access to
health care and clean water, or more workers can
find jobs to make a better future for their
families. We have a moral obligation to measure
the success of our development assistance by
whether it is delivering results. For this
reason, we will continue to demand that our own
development assistance as well as assistance
from the multilateral development banks has
measurable goals and concrete benchmarks for
achieving those goals. Thanks to U.S.
leadership, the recent IDA replenishment
agreement will establish a monitoring and
evaluation system that measures recipient
countries' progress. For the first time, donors
can link a portion of their contributions to IDA
to the achievement of actual development
results, and part of the U.S. contribution is
linked in this way. We will strive to make sure
that the World Bank and other multilateral
development banks build on this progress so that
a focus on results is an integral part of
everything that these institutions do.
* Increase the amount of development assistance
that is provided in the form of grants instead
of loans. Greater use of results-based grants is
the best way to help poor countries make
productive investments, particularly in the
social sectors, without saddling them with
ever-larger debt burdens. As a result of U.S.
leadership, the recent IDA agreement provided
for significant increases in grant funding for
the poorest countries for education, HIV/AIDS,
health, nutrition, water, sanitation, and other
human needs. Our goal is to build on that
progress by increasing the use of grants at the
other multilateral development banks. We will
also challenge universities, nonprofits, and the
private sector to match government efforts by
using grants to support development projects
that show results.
* Open societies to commerce and investment.
Trade and investment are the real engines of
economic growth. Even if government aid
increases, most money for development must come
from trade, domestic capital, and foreign
investment. An effective strategy must try to
expand these flows as well. Free markets and
free trade are key priorities of our national
security strategy.
* Secure public health. The scale of the
public health crisis in poor countries is
enormous. In countries afflicted by epidemics
and pandemics like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and
tuberculosis, growth and development will be
threatened until these scourges can be
contained. Resources from the developed world
are necessary but will be effective only with
honest governance, which supports prevention
programs and provides effective local
infrastructure. The United States has strongly
backed the new global fund for HIV/AIDS
organized by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan
and its focus on combining prevention with a
broad strategy for treatment and care. The
United States already contributes more than
twice as much money to such efforts as the next
largest donor. If the global fund demonstrates
its promise, we will be ready to give even more.
* Emphasize education. Literacy and
learning are the foundation of democracy and
development. Only about 7 percent of World Bank
resources are devoted to education. This
proportion should grow. The United States will
increase its own funding for education
assistance by at least 20 percent with an
emphasis on improving basic education and
teacher training in Africa. The United States
can also bring information technology to these
societies, many of whose education systems have
been devastated by AIDS.
* Continue to aid agricultural development.
New technologies, including biotechnology, have
enormous potential to improve crop yields in
developing countries while using fewer
pesticides and less water. Using sound science,
the United States should help bring these
benefits to the 800 million people, including
300 million children, who still suffer from
hunger and malnutrition.
VIII. Develop Agendas for Cooperative Action
with the Other Main Centers of Global Power
"We have our best chance since the rise of
the nation-state in the 17th century to build a
world where the great powers compete in peace
instead of prepare for war." President Bush,
West Point, New York, June 1, 2002
America will implement its strategies by
organizing coalitions - as broad as practicable
- of states able and willing to promote a
balance of power that favors freedom. Effective
coalition leadership requires clear priorities,
an appreciation of others' interests, and
consistent consultations among partners with a
spirit of humility.
There is little of lasting consequence that the
United States can accomplish in the world
without the sustained cooperation of its allies
and friends in Canada and Europe. Europe is also
the seat of two of the strongest and most able
international institutions in the world: the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which
has, since its inception, been the fulcrum of
transatlantic and inter-European security, and
the European Union (EU), our partner in opening
world trade.
The attacks of September 11 were also an attack
on NATO, as NATO itself recognized when it
invoked its Article V self-defense clause for
the first time. NATO's core mission - collective
defense of the transatlantic alliance of
democracies - remains, but NATO must develop new
structures and capabilities to carry out that
mission under new circumstances. NATO must build
a capability to field, at short notice, highly
mobile, specially trained forces whenever they
are needed to respond to a threat against any
member of the alliance.
The alliance must be able to act wherever our
interests are threatened, creating coalitions
under NATO's own mandate, as well as
contributing to mission-based coalitions. To
achieve this, we must:
* expand NATO's membership to those democratic
nations willing and able to share the burden of
defending and advancing our common interests;
* ensure that the military forces of NATO
nations have appropriate combat contributions to
make in coalition warfare;
* develop planning processes to enable those
contributions to become effective multinational
fighting forces;
* take advantage of the technological
opportunities and economies of scale in our
defense spending to transform NATO military
forces so that they dominate potential
aggressors and diminish our vulnerabilities;
* streamline and increase the flexibility of
command structures to meet new operational
demands and the associated requirements of
training, integrating, and experimenting with
new force configurations; and
* maintain the ability to work and fight
together as allies even as we take the necessary
steps to transform and modernize our forces.
If NATO succeeds in enacting these changes, the
rewards will be a partnership as central to the
security and interests of its member states as
was the case during the Cold War. We will
sustain a common perspective on the threats to
our societies and improve our ability to take
common action in defense of our nations and
their interests. At the same time, we welcome
our European allies' efforts to forge a greater
foreign policy and defense identity with the EU,
and commit ourselves to close consultations to
ensure that these developments work with NATO.
We cannot afford to lose this opportunity to
better prepare the family of transatlantic
democracies for the challenges to come.
The attacks of September 11 energized America's
Asian alliances. Australia invoked the ANZUS
Treaty to declare the September 11 was an attack
on Australia itself, following that historic
decision with the dispatch of some of the
world's finest combat forces for Operation
Enduring Freedom. Japan and the Republic of
Korea provided unprecedented levels of military
logistical support within weeks of the terrorist
attack. We have deepened cooperation on
counter-terrorism with our alliance partners in
Thailand and the Philippines and received
invaluable assistance from close friends like
Singapore and New Zealand.
The war against terrorism has proven that
America's alliances in Asia not only underpin
regional peace and stability, but are flexible
and ready to deal with new challenges. To
enhance our Asian alliances and friendships, we
will:
* look to Japan to continue forging a leading
role in regional and global affairs based on our
common interests, our common values, and our
close defense and diplomatic cooperation;
* work with South Korea to maintain vigilance
towards the North while preparing our alliance
to make contributions to the broader stability
of the region over the longer-term;
* build on 50 years of U.S.-Australian alliance
cooperation as we continue working together to
resolve regional and global problems -- as we
have so many times from the Battle of Leyte Gulf
to Tora Bora;
* maintain forces in the region that reflect our
commitments to our allies, our requirements, our
technological advances, and the strategic
environment; and
* build on stability provided by these
alliances, as well as with institutions such as
ASEAN and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
forum, to develop a mix of regional and
bilateral strategies to manage change in this
dynamic region.
We are attentive to the possible renewal of old
patterns of great power competition. Several
potential great powers are now in the midst of
internal transition - most importantly Russia,
India, and China. In all three cases, recent
developments have encouraged our hope that a
truly global consensus about basic principles is
slowly taking shape.
With Russia, we are already building a new
strategic relationship based on a central
reality of the twenty-first century: the United
States and Russia are no longer strategic
adversaries. The Moscow Treaty on Strategic
Reductions is emblematic of this new reality and
reflects a critical change in Russian thinking
that promises to lead to productive, long-term
relations with the Euro-Atlantic community and
the United States. Russia's top leaders have a
realistic assessment of their country's current
weakness and the policies - internal and
external - needed to reverse those weaknesses.
They understand, increasingly, that Cold War
approaches do not serve their national interests
and that Russian and American strategic
interests overlap in many areas.
United States policy seeks to use this turn in
Russian thinking to refocus our relationship on
emerging and potential common interests and
challenges. We are broadening our already
extensive cooperation in the global war on
terrorism. We are facilitating Russia's entry
into the World Trade Organization, without
lowering standards for accession, to promote
beneficial bilateral trade and investment
relations. We have created the NATO-Russia
Council with the goal of deepening security
cooperation among Russia, our European allies,
and ourselves. We will continue to bolster the
independence and stability of the states of the
former Soviet Union in the belief that a
prosperous and stable neighborhood will
reinforce Russia's growing commitment to
integration into the Euro-Atlantic community.
At the same time, we are realistic about the
differences that still divide us from Russia and
about the time and effort it will take to build
an enduring strategic partnership. Lingering
distrust of our motives and policies by key
Russian elites slows improvement in our
relations. Russia's uneven commitment to the
basic values of free-market democracy and
dubious record in combating the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction remain matters of
great concern. Russia's very weakness limits the
opportunities for cooperation. Nevertheless,
those opportunities are vastly greater now than
in recent years - or even decades.
The United States has undertaken a
transformation in its bilateral relationship
with India based on a conviction that U.S.
interests require a strong relationship with
India. We are the two largest democracies,
committed to political freedom protected by
representative government. India is moving
toward greater economic freedom as well. We have
a common interest in the free flow of commerce,
including through the vital sea lanes of the
Indian Ocean. Finally, we share an interest in
fighting terrorism and in creating a
strategically stable Asia.
Differences remain, including over the
development of India's nuclear and missile
programs, and the pace of India's economic
reforms. But while in the past these concerns
may have dominated our thinking about India,
today we start with a view of India as a growing
world power with which we have common strategic
interests. Through a strong partnership with
India, we can best address any differences and
shape a dynamic future.
The United States relationship with China is an
important part of our strategy to promote a
stable, peaceful, and prosperous Asia-Pacific
region. We welcome the emergence of a strong,
peaceful, and prosperous China. The democratic
development of China is crucial to that future.
Yet, a quarter century after beginning the
process of shedding the worst features of the
Communist legacy, China's leaders have not yet
made the next series of fundamental choices
about the character of their state. In pursuing
advanced military capabilities that can threaten
its neighbors in the Asia-Pacific region, China
is following an outdated path that, in the end,
will hamper its own pursuit of national
greatness. In time, China will find that social
and political freedom is the only source of that
greatness.
The United States seeks a constructive
relationship with a changing China. We already
cooperate well where our interests overlap,
including the current war on terrorism and in
promoting stability on the Korean peninsula.
Likewise, we have coordinated on the future of
Afghanistan and have initiated a comprehensive
dialogue on counter-terrorism and similar
transitional concerns. Shared health and
environmental threats, such as the spread of
HIV/AIDS, challenge us to promote jointly the
welfare of our citizens.
Addressing these transnational threats will
challenge China to become more open with
information, promote the development of civil
society, and enhance individual human rights.
China has begun to take the road to political
openness, permitting many personal freedoms and
conducting village-level elections, yet remains
strongly committed to national one-party rule by
the Communist Party. To make that nation truly
accountable to its citizen's needs and
aspirations, however, much work remains to be
done. Only by allowing the Chinese people to
think, assemble, and worship freely can China
reach its full potential.
Our important trade relationship will benefit
from China's entry into the World Trade
Organization, which will create more export
opportunities and ultimately more jobs for
American farmers, workers, and companies. China
is our fourth largest trading partner, with over
$100 billion in annual two-way trade. The power
of market principles and the WTO's requirements
for transparency and accountability will advance
openness and the rule of law in China to help
establish basic protections for commerce and for
citizens. There are, however, other areas in
which we have profound disagreements. Our
commitment to the self-defense of Taiwan under
the Taiwan Relations Act is one. Human rights is
another. We expect China to adhere to its
nonproliferation commitments. We will work to
narrow differences where they exist, but not
allow them to preclude cooperation where we
agree.
The events of September 11, 2001, fundamentally
changed the context for relations between the
United States and other main centers of global
power, and opened vast, new opportunities. With
our long-standing allies in Europe and Asia, and
with leaders in Russia, India, and China, we
must develop active agendas of cooperation lest
these relationships become routine and
unproductive.
Every agency of the United States Government
shares the challenge. We can build fruitful
habits of consultation, quiet argument, sober
analysis, and common action. In the long-term,
these are the practices that will sustain the
supremacy of our common principles and keep open
the path of progress.
IX. Transform America's National Security
Institutions to Meet the Challenges and
Opportunities of the Twenty-First Century
"Terrorists attacked a symbol of American
prosperity. They did not touch its source.
America is successful because of the hard work,
creativity, and enterprise of our people."
President Bush, Washington, D.C. (Joint Session
of Congress), September 20, 2001
The major institutions of American national
security were designed in a different era to
meet different requirements. All of them must be
transformed.
It is time to reaffirm the essential role of
American military strength. We must build and
maintain our defenses beyond challenge. Our
military's highest priority is to defend the
United States. To do so effectively, our
military must:
* assure our allies and friends;
* dissuade future military competition;
* deter threats against U.S. interests, allies,
and friends; and
* decisively defeat any adversary if deterrence
fails.
The unparalleled strength of the United States
armed forces, and their forward presence, have
maintained the peace in some of the world's most
strategically vital regions. However, the
threats and enemies we must confront have
changed, and so must our forces. A military
structured to deter massive Cold War-era armies
must be transformed to focus more on how an
adversary might fight rather than where and when
a war might occur. We will channel our energies
to overcome a host of operational challenges.
The presence of American forces overseas is one
of the most profound symbols of the U.S.
commitments to allies and friends. Through our
willingness to use force in our own defense and
in defense of others, the United States
demonstrates its resolve to maintain a balance
of power that favors freedom. To contend with
uncertainty and to meet the many security
challenges we face, the United States will
require bases and stations within and beyond
Western Europe and Northeast Asia, as well as
temporary access arrangements for the
long-distance deployment of U.S. forces.
Before the war in Afghanistan, that area was low
on the list of major planning contingencies.
Yet, in a very short time, we had to operate
across the length and breadth of that remote
nation, using every branch of the armed forces.
We must prepare for more such deployments by
developing assets such as advanced remote
sensing, long-range precision strike
capabilities, and transformed maneuver and
expeditionary forces. This broad portfolio of
military capabilities must also include the
ability to defend the homeland, conduct
information operations, ensure U.S. access to
distant theaters, and protect critical U.S.
infrastructure and assets in outer space.
Innovation within the armed forces will rest on
experimentation with new approaches to warfare,
strengthening joint operations, exploiting U.S.
intelligence advantages, and taking full
advantage of science and technology. We must
also transform the way the Department of Defense
is run, especially in financial management and
recruitment and retention. Finally, while
maintaining near-term readiness and the ability
to fight the war on terrorism, the goal must be
to provide the President with a wider range of
military options to discourage aggression or any
form of coercion against the United States, our
allies, and our friends.
We know from history that deterrence can fail;
and we know from experience that some enemies
cannot be deterred. The United States must and
will maintain the capability to defeat any
attempt by an enemy - whether a state or
non-state actor - to impose its will on the
United States, our allies, or our friends. We
will maintain the forces sufficient to support
our obligations, and to defend freedom. Our
forces will be strong enough to dissuade
potential adversaries from pursuing a military
build-up in hopes of surpassing, or equaling,
the power of the United States.
Intelligence - and how we use it - is our first
line of defense against terrorists and the
threat posed by hostile states. Designed around
the priority of gathering enormous information
about a massive, fixed object - the Soviet bloc
- the intelligence community is coping with the
challenge of following a far more complex and
elusive set of targets.
We must transform our intelligence capabilities
and build new ones to keep pace with the nature
of these threats. Intelligence must be
appropriately integrated with our defense and
law enforcement systems and coordinated with our
allies and friends. We need to protect the
capabilities we have so that we do not arm our
enemies with the knowledge of how best to
surprise us. Those who would harm us also seek
the benefit of surprise to limit our prevention
and response options and to maximize injury.
We must strengthen intelligence warning and
analysis to provide integrated threat
assessments for national and homeland security.
Since the threats inspired by foreign
governments and groups may be conducted inside
the United States, we must also ensure the
proper fusion of information between
intelligence and law enforcement.
Initiatives in this area will include:
* strengthening the authority of the Director of
Central Intelligence to lead the development and
actions of the Nation's foreign intelligence
capabilities;
* establishing a new framework for intelligence
warning that provides seamless and integrated
warning across the spectrum of threats facing
the nation and our allies;
* continuing to develop new methods of
collecting information to sustain our
intelligence advantage;
* investing in future capabilities while working
to protect them through a more vigorous effort
to prevent the compromise of intelligence
capabilities; and
* collecting intelligence against the terrorist
danger across the government with all-source
analysis.
As the United States Government relies on the
armed forces to defend America's interests, it
must rely on diplomacy to interact with other
nations. We will ensure that the Department of
State receives funding sufficient to ensure the
success of American diplomacy. The State
Department takes the lead in managing our
bilateral relationships with other governments.
And in this new era, its people and institutions
must be able to interact equally adroitly with
non-governmental organizations and international
institutions. Officials trained mainly in
international politics must also extend their
reach to understand complex issues of domestic
governance around the world, including public
health, education, law enforcement, the
judiciary, and public diplomacy.
Our diplomats serve at the front line of complex
negotiations, civil wars, and other humanitarian
catastrophes. As humanitarian relief
requirements are better understood, we must also
be able to help build police forces, court
systems, and legal codes, local and provincial
government institutions, and electoral systems.
Effective international cooperation is needed to
accomplish these goals, backed by American
readiness to play our part.
Just as our diplomatic institutions must adapt
so that we can reach out to others, we also need
a different and more comprehensive approach to
public information efforts that can help people
around the world learn about and understand
America. The war on terrorism is not a clash of
civilizations. It does, however, reveal the
clash inside a civilization, a battle for the
future of the Muslim world. This is a struggle
of ideas and this is an area where America must
excel.
We will take the actions necessary to ensure
that our efforts to meet our global security
commitments and protect Americans are not
impaired by the potential for investigations,
inquiry, or prosecution by the International
Criminal Court (ICC), whose jurisdiction does
not extend to Americans and which we do not
accept. We will work together with other nations
to avoid complications in our military
operations and cooperation, through such
mechanisms as multilateral and bilateral
agreements that will protect U.S. nationals from
the ICC. We will implement fully the American
Servicemembers Protection Act, whose provisions
are intended to ensure and enhance the
protection of U.S. personnel and officials.
We will make hard choices in the coming year and
beyond to ensure the right level and allocation
of government spending on national security. The
United States Government must strengthen its
defenses to win this war. At home, our most
important priority is to protect the homeland
for the American people.
Today, the distinction between domestic and
foreign affairs is diminishing. In a globalized
world, events beyond America's borders have a
greater impact inside them. Our society must be
open to people, ideas, and goods from across the
globe. The characteristics we most cherish - our
freedom, our cities, our systems of movement,
and modern life - are vulnerable to terrorism.
This vulnerability will persist long after we
bring to justice those responsible for the
September eleventh attacks. As time passes,
individuals may gain access to means of
destruction that until now could be wielded only
by armies, fleets, and squadrons. This is a new
condition of life. We will adjust to it and
thrive - in spite of it.
In exercising our leadership, we will respect
the values, judgment, and interests of our
friends and partners. Still, we will be prepared
to act apart when our interests and unique
responsibilities require. When we disagree on
particulars, we will explain forthrightly the
grounds for our concerns and strive to forge
viable alternatives. We will not allow such
disagreements to obscure our determination to
secure together, with our allies and our
friends, our shared fundamental interests and
values.
Ultimately, the foundation of American strength
is at home. It is in the skills of our people,
the dynamism of our economy, and the resilience
of our institutions. A diverse, modern society
has inherent, ambitious, entrepreneurial energy.
Our strength comes from what we do with that
energy. That is where our national security
begins.
Wes Penre is the owner of the domain
Illuminati News and the publisher of the same. Please also check
out his MySpace website:
http://www.myspace.com/wespenre.
This
page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.