Former Defense Secretary's
conversation with military analysts
on political problems - "The
Correction For That...Is An Attack"
Shocking excerpts of confidential
recordings recently released under
the Freedom of Information Act
feature former Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld talking with top
military analysts about how a
flagging Neo-Con political agenda
could be successfully restored with
the aid of another terrorist attack
on America.
The tape also includes a
conversation where Rumsfeld and the
military analysts agree on the
possible necessity of installing a
brutal dictator in Iraq to oversee
U.S. interests.
The tapes were released as part of
the investigation into the
Pentagon's "message force
multipliers" program in which top
military analysts were hired to
propagandize for the Iraq war in the
corporate media.
In attendance at the valedictory
luncheon Rumsfeld hosted on December
12, 2006 were David L. Grange,
Donald W. Sheppard, James Marks,
Rick Francona, Wayne Downing, and
Robert H. Scales, Jr. among others.
The most extraordinary exchange
takes place when Lt. Gen. Michael
DeLong bemoans shrinking political
support for Neo-Con war plans on
Capitol Hill and suggests that
sympathy for the Bush
administration's agenda will only be
achieved after a new terror attack.
Rumsfeld agrees that the
psychological impact of 9/11 is
wearing off and the "behavior
pattern" of citizens in both the
U.S. and Europe suggests that they
are unconcerned about the threat of
terror.
DELONG: Politically, what are
the challenges because you're
not going to have a lot of
sympathetic ears up there until
it [a terror attack] happens.
RUMSFELD: That's what I was
just going to say. This
President's pretty much a victim
of success. We haven't had an
attack in five years. The
perception of the threat is so
low in this society that it's
not surprising that the behavior
pattern reflects a low threat
assessment. The same thing's in
Europe, there's a low threat
perception. The
correction for that, I suppose,
is an attack.
And when that happens, then
everyone gets energized for
another [inaudible] and it's a
shame we don't have the maturity
to recognize the seriousness of
the threats...the lethality, the
carnage, that can be imposed on
our society is so real and so
present and so serious that
you'd think we'd be able to
understand it, but as a society,
the longer you get away from
9/11, the less...the less...
Click here for
the audio clip.
In another exchange, after assuring
that comments are "off the record,"
Rumsfeld and one of the military
analysts agree that Iraq could use a
"Syngman Rhee" to take control of
Iraq. Syngman Rhee was the ruthless
authoritarian dictator of South
Korea from after World War II
through the Korean War to 1960. If
the invasion of Iraq was about
liberating the Iraqis from a tyrant
in the form of Saddam Hussein why is
Rumsfeld talking about installing an
even more brutal dictator?
Click here for
the audio clip.
Newsvine has the recording in
full.
Rumsfeld's admission that the
correction for dwindling support of
the Neo-Con imperial crusade is
another terror attack is perhaps the
most startling and blatant
indication that 9/11 was an inside
job.
How much more evidence do we need to
confirm that the Neo-Con hierarchy
in control of the U.S. government
are instigating and exploiting
terror in the pursuit of their own
domestic and geopolitical agenda?
As Jerry Mazza writes today, "In
the seven years since the day,
exhaustive and still growing
evidence proves beyond any
reasonable doubt that the US
government, spearheaded by the
Bush administration, planned,
orchestrated and executed the
9/11 false flag operation. As
openly advocated by wide swaths
of elites, from the Project for
the New American Century (PNAC),
of which Rumsfeld has been a
member, to the likes of Zbigniew
Brzezinski (in his The Grand
Chessboard), only an attack “on
the order of Pearl Harbor”
would, in Brzezinski’s words,
cause the American people to
support an “imperial
mobilization,” and a world war."
Placing
the new evidence against
previously revealed 9/11-related
acts on the part of Rumsfeld,
his guilt is overt and obvious.
Recall that it was Rumsfeld who
enthusiastically penned the
"Go Massive"
memo, gleefully declaring the
Bush administration finally had
the green light to kill: “Not
only UBL (Usama bin Laden). Go
massive. Sweep it all up. Things
related and not.”
The longing for a new terror attack
to corral the masses back behind the
Neo-Con agenda is a shared fetish
amongst Neo-Cons, policy wonks and
academics alike.
In August last year
Philadelphia Daily News columnist
Stu Bykofsky openly called for
"another 9/11" that "would help
America" restore a "community of
outrage and national resolve".
Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the
war studies program at the Royal
Military College in Kingston,
Ontario,
told the Toronto Star last July
that "The key to bolstering Western
resolve is another terrorist attack
like 9/11 or the London transit
bombings of two years ago."
The same sentiment was also
explicitly expressed in a
2005 GOP memo, which yearned for
new attacks that would "validate"
the President's war on terror and
"restore his image as a leader of
the American people."
Also in July 2007,
former Republican Senator Rick
Santorum suggested that a series
of "unfortunate events," namely
terrorist attacks, will occur within
the next year and change American
citizen's perception of the war.
And the month before that, the new
chairman of the Arkansas Republican
Party
Dennis Milligan said that there
needed to be more attacks on
American soil for President Bush
to regain popular approval.
Comments
posted on the left-wing Huffington
Post website in response to the
Rumsfeld tape indicate that even
some of the most hardcore conspiracy
debunkers have had their beliefs
shaken to the core by the former
Defense Secretary's admission.
"I have been a very staunch opponent
of conspiracy theories," writes one,
"but to hear the man most
responsible for stopping foreign
threats to American lives musing
that a successful attack on the USA
is somehow a "cure" for us... it
almost makes me want to make a
tinfoil hat with the nuts I made fun
of."