British scientist and member of
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice , John A. Blacker MSc IMI
(Physical Systems), is planning to sue the BBC for mass public
deception via their “9/11: The Conspiracy Files” programme,
RINF Alternative News can
The programme which aired on 18 February,
2007, promised to offer a thorough examination of the events of
9/11 and answer many of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth
However, the hour long programme failed to
investigate the tough questions and ignored hard evidence that
points towards a deeper conspiracy, while presenting an unfair
and unbalanced view of 9/11 research.
Scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11
Truth & Justice, John A. Blacker, is taking action against this
portrayal on the grounds of ‘Total Public Deception’.
In ongoing correspondence with the BBC, Mr.
Blacker is requesting an official apology and a second programme to
be produced in order to ‘set the record straight’.
Mr Blacker is preparing to take legal action
against the BBC and is currently gathering evidence.
Earlier this month, ex MI5 whistleblower,
David Shayler, along with Adrian Connock, producer of Mind the
Gap which exposed the false flag terrorism in London on 7/7/05,
extensive video rebuttal destroying the BBC’s attempt to
discredit scientific evidence and eyewitness reports.
“How can 80+ strongest, undamaged and
heaviest bottom floors offer only 0.78 seconds of resistance
between them - yet were designed and built to withstand 3 times
working load and have “indestructible cores” when new. This is
without considering air resistance and any other slowing effect.
“This simple maths proves 911 was a
demolition,” he said.
In Mr. Blacker’s most recent letter to the
BBC he provides scientific evidence to support his theory of a
Dear Secretary Bruce Vander,
Thank you for your letter dated 4
June 2007 from Colin Tregear.
I do indeed intend to take this
matter to the next level for the following reasons and I want at
least an apology if not a second program setting the record
straight and exposing the true 911 facts as opposed to the
official government lies.
I fully accept the Conspiracy
files program was only 59 minutes long, so why if time was so
short, was copious time spent exploring the work of a weird
science fiction writer who was not even there on 911 - as
opposed to evaluating the merits of the recorded Physics
Evidence (FACTS) of which are the core concerns of the
“Government account” sceptics such as myself?
Below are the science facts,
which clearly, conclusively, prove that 911 was a Deliberate
Only a controlled demolition can
collapse a 3 times working load, 47 massive steal core column
steel framed building at freefall speed.
It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3
times working design load) bottom 80 floors to offer near zero
resistance to the falling floors except when there is a
controlled demolition. Period!
How on earth can you claim the
Conspiracy Files Documentary had anything to do with detail or
forensic examination of the evidence if you totally avoided all
of the Physics à
which is in itself helping to fuel the many “conspiracy
theories” - YET not once was there even a whiff of even any
first hand accounts from key witnesses such as William Rodriguez
(The Last Man Out) or any of the other first hand witnesses on
William Rodriguez states quite
categorically in an interview with the BBC - BOMBS went off even
before the first plane hit and continued to be set off - yet you
spent ages interviewing 2nd & 3rd hand
witnesses such as a distressed grieving sister & some weird
science fiction writer who were simply not present on 911.
Caption above: William Rodriguez states
quite categorically in an interview with the BBC – A large BOMB
went off even before the first plane hit and took out the sub
basement level 002.
If the BBC had been concentrating
properly on detail and forensic examination as you claim to me
in your letter then you would not have omitted the
following key 13 items: -
1 No mention of US government history of total deceit,
using Standown orders and fake events as pretexts for war, in
which on one occasion alone over 50,000 US troops and 1,000,000
+ Vietcong died during the following Vietnam war.
No mention of published US government documents which set
out how to invade Cuba using a pretext of fake hijacked planes,
terrorist attacks on Americans, deliberate horrific murder of US
civilians so as to cause the invasion of Cuba hence start
nuclear war WW3. (Operation Northwoods)
No interviews with key high witnesses such as police
officers, fire fighters or National 911 hero William Rodriguez
(Last Man Out) and other key 911 event witnesses. (See your own
BBC archive) No mention of key witness testimony, radio traffic,
and other key video evidence, which clearly demonstrates many
explosions from within the twin towers prior to planes hitting
No mention that all three buildings fell at freefall
speed and that no steel framed building had ever collapsed due
to fires prior or since 911. Yet many fires were much hotter and
much longer. You made no attempt what so ever to explain why all
3 buildings fell at freefall speed - You simply deliberately
avoided the Physics.
No mention of the omission of many high
witness testimonies from the 911 commission’s final report.
No mention of the interpreter who testified she had translated
documents which gave key specific 911 details to the
authorities. No mention that Mossad, UK, French and other
intelligence agencies had warned the US weeks prior of immanent
attack by Arab terrorists using Jumbos to launch at buildings –
yet airport security was not stepped up. You failed to mention
building 007 was completely omitted from the official 911
Commission’s final report.
No mention that Bush, Rumsfeld & Condi lied claiming they
had no idea or even suspicion terrorist would ever use planes as
terrorist weapons. (Yet were doing a terrorist/plane exercise on
the morning of 911)
No mention that Bush, “the Commander in Chief” when told:
“America is under Attack”
Kept on reading a stupid goat
story à this in
itself is a total dereliction of duty hence a treasonable
offence. Its worse than if an on duty paramedic answers a
distress call that children have just been mowed over by a
wagon - then calmly finishes their morning tea & toast.
No mention the Pentagon had missile batteries which
should shoot down any aircraft that is unauthorised entering its
airspace, and that both the outer and inner systems failed to
activate – yet you interviewed the actual transport plane pilot
who knew full well the Pentagon was missile armed and mentioned
nothing of this when referring to what he claimed he observed.
No mention that two planes were reported by two
independent sources as landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due
to two separate bomb threats, not just
one, and that flight 93 was one of those reported to have landed
A 757 simply cannot fly at ground level due to what is
known as “Ground Effect”. You show a so called independent
computer animator who suggests that jet fuel caused most of the
damage at the Pentagon, yet failed to mention his animation
omitted the two 9 ft, 6 tonne engines
from the animation and also the clear fact his animation totally
contradicts photographs of the Pentagon prior to collapse.
Hello! What sort of BBC Deceit is that? Also, his animation
failed to account for the fact 6 reinforced concrete
walls were penetrated
à they omitted the 6
reinforced walls completely. Indeed, the official image of the
hole in the inner wall of the C block shows this animation to be
total and utter fiction, yet the BBC gave it raving
credibility. Question: Why did you fail to mention these key
contradictions? Answer: Because you were trying to make the
truth movement & its members including myself look stupid,
fruitcake and unworthy of measured consideration and the BBC was
deliberately deceiving the British Public. Period.
3 floors only were pancaked, yet your film suggested the
discredited 60 seconds pancake theory had validity when in fact
it has already been discredited as totally implausible. You
deceived the public into thinking such implausible official
theory stacked up and made any sense – yet the animation failed
to account for the actual NIST reported and videoed 10 seconds
freefall speeds and also the utter collapse of all building
cores to DUST. In other words, this was a deliberate clear case
of total deception on your part. Your film was totally
deceitfully & factually false.
Re flight 93: Your film claimed it was alleged by
“Conspiracy Theorists” to be an 8-mile debris field, but when
you investigated the claim it turned out to be about 8 miles by
road but only 1 mile as the crow flies. This is yet further
total, absolute deceit on your part. Flight 93 had, according
to local official police and fire/rescue
sources who actually did the search
à an 8-mile debris
Your film clearly states: “the evidence points to a
conspiracy after 911 - not before. You
stated, “The other 911 conspiracy theories are just that,
theories, the evidence does not support them”.
This is blatantly a false misleading statement.
Even your own report stated that Government agents attempted to
action protection for the US prior to
911. Indeed, failing to act on intelligence is a treasonable
Obviously you now need a second
attempt to put the record straight seeing as you did not have
enough time in the first 59 minutes. Why do you not improve
your reputation and credibility as a stickler for “detail or
forensic examination” of the evidence and actually do a second
more in-depth documentary incorporating some or all of the
omission of your other “detailed and forensic examination”?
This time perhaps you could cover the real
Physics and also interview actual first hand police and fire
rescue officers - as not once did your
previouse “detailed and forensic analysis” include any actual
Physics or any such first hand witness accounts yet
your journalist had spoken to said witnesses but deliberately
chose to omit these reports from the final documentary.
Can I once again point out that I
am not a “Conspiracy theorist” – I am a Physicist proposing
credible Physical Hypothesis based solely upon the Indisputable
Physics facts, Maths & Physical Evidence.
I would very much like to be in
your next film explaining why buildings simply cannot collapse
at freefall without the use of explosives to destroy the
foundations first. Better still, why not interview my senior
Professor Steven Jones and he will no doubt explain it even
better than I with my Physics Masters degree & Mechanical
Engineering Qualifications. Indeed, pit us against the likes of
your Popular Mechanics Crew in a 911 WWF style tag team punk
In your last attempt at obtaining
the facts without even the whiff of any proof you let Popular
Mechanics claim Building 007 was not a demolition, quote: -
“ I understand why people might
think that, uh rm, and I see what they are saying, but when you
learn the facts about the way the building was built, and about
the way that it supported itself and the damage that was done
from the collapsing towers that proceeded it – the idea that it
was a demolition just holds no water.”
I have a safe seafront villa in
Baghdad with a bomb crater in the rear yard I will sell you real
cheep if you are willing to buy such utter diatribe!
Both the above statements could
not be further from the truth and you know it, notice how the
Popular Mechanics guy never once mentions the piddly little
fires in building 007 sexed up to be towering infernos by the
media, or the alleged exploding gas tank as claimed by official
sources for being the cause of collapse. More importantly -
Also notice how Building 007 is not mentioned once in the “911
Commission Final Report” at all!
The omission of any mention of
Building 007 is because it could be nothing other than
controlled implosive demolition and they know so, so
they deliberately ignore it. If you look at the very
top of Building 007 as it starts to collapse you notice a crimp
to the side of the penthouse, then the penthouse which is
housing the air-conditioning units etc, collapses entirely, and
only then does the rest of the building collapse at freefall
speed onto its own footprint with the outer walls on top. The
fires and damage were over 20 floors below the penthouse,
how could fire and lower level damage collapse the
penthouse on the roof and not the floors in-between?
The dust cloud from the base of
the building is caused because the basement is explosively blown
and hence you see a large rising dust cloud of super heated
pulverised concrete dust. The building, despite its damage on
one side from the fall of other building debris – falls straight
down at freefall ending up filling the previously blown basement
and with the outer walls pulled on top because the central
column which caused the initial crimp folds the building inwards
due to the lack of interior and basement structural support as
the building accelerates to earth under only GRAVITY.
If Building 007 had fallen slower
than freefall and toppled over there may have been the
likelihood of fire or structural damage causing the failure.
But, as with the twin towers, Building 007 fell at freefall onto
its own footprint hence for this to happen the basement and
lower floor supports have to be eliminated prior to the top
collapsing – hence à
timed video evidence alone supplies absolute categorical proof
of a controlled and implosive deliberate demolition to building
007 and the twin towers on 911. Of course the seismic data
merely reinforces what the videos show.
Your Film did not show any of
these points à hence
is verging on Treasonous Media Deception which requires
investigation; an apology to me as a viewer, and better still a
new program encompassing all of the omissions of key evidence
not shown in the first program.
I ask that all of my previouse
letters be sent to the new investigating department forthwith
and for a formal investigation into my allegations of BBC
journalist deception are investigated thoroughly and honestly.
Mr J A Blacker MSc IMI (Physical
Systems) (Lancaster England)
ENC: Physics paper describing
“Demolition 911” and also the political deception.
J. A. Blacker MSc IMI (Physical
Systems) (Lancaster England) June 07
911 Hypothesis Encompassing Witnessed, &/Or, Indisputable
Physical Evidence (facts).
Key characteristics of 911 building demolition events: Straight
Down Motion -
Sudden Structural Failure - Buildings Collapsing At
Total Collapse Of The Entire Load Bearing Cores
Many Examples of Cleanly Sliced Heavy Girder Steel Core Supports
Dust Clouds Containing Heavy Girders In Highly Energetic
Horizontal Ejections Of Heavy Girders And Pulverised Concrete
Onto The Tops And Embedded Into Surrounding Buildings
Rescuers Reported And Seismic And Other Detectors Recorded
Energy Dissipation Produced By Many Explosions
in real time by several different independent sources) In
Pools of molten Steel recorded over 1 week after collapse in the
paper written by Physics Professor Steven Jones) Closer
inspection of original video evidence shows heavy steel core
columns turning to dust within seconds – question: - was a
novel “StarWars type” energy directed beam weapon used in
conjunction with explosives to undermine the integrity of the
twin tower complex? (Refer to work by Dr Judy Wood and Professor
Jim Fetzer) To date the steel dust creating mechanism has not
been formally identified & understood – however - Muslim
Terrorists do not posses such advanced metal to dust creating
technology – only the US military.
Physics Facts & Conclusions
three buildings at ground zero in New York on 9/11, buildings
001, 002 & building 007 - came down at or about freefall speed
onto their own footprint thereabouts, with outside walls on
Free-fall speed of decent is
caused because the supports for the lower floors are destroyed
by metal shattering or cutting explosives and/or thermate - so
that when the upper floors are brought down onto the lower
floors, no resistance is encountered and therefore the entire
building & its components accelerate towards the earth under the
force of gravity at or about freefall speed. Only
Demolitions can collapse steel framed buildings at free-fall
speed and have all the above-recorded indisputable
characteristics. As no
plane hit building 7, yet that also came to ground in the late
afternoon, this is yet further evidence of Controlled Implosive
Demolition to building 7 - because had fuel tanks exploded
inside building 7 as was the official claim, it would certainly
not have collapsed on to its own footprint (more or less) with
the outer walls on top. Rather, exploding debris and fireballs
would have been recorded on video shooting from the building,
indeed only large clouds of dust from the basement area and then
straight down motion of the entire structure in less than 7
seconds was in actual fact recorded. Summary
- A careful physical analysis clearly demonstrates that, the
fall of the buildings cannot be due to the aircraft impact
and/or Jet fuel fire damage alone, or any pre-existing weakness
in the 3 buildings.
Political Conclusion based upon
the Recorded 911 Physical Evidence.
Physics evidence shows 911 was a clear case of deliberate plane
crashes followed by lies, deceit & treason combined with
Controlled Implosive Demolition as part of the United States
& UK Government’s cover-up and total deceit. Most Media have
played their roll in said hideous regime type deception due to
vested interests. A Muslim terrorist could not stop or confuse
NORAD air defence so as to prevent NORAD fighter jet
interception. A Muslim terrorist could not order the
non-forensic removal and destruction of the 911 Plane/building
wreckage evidence. A Muslim terrorist could not remove and keep
from the world public; Pentagon CCTV, Radio communications audio
and other key video evidence, and also continue to do so some 5
years hence, including gagging orders of fire fighters, police
and local officials - who claim many bombs went off within the
3 buildings (Seismic data does not lie). A Muslim terrorist
could not, and did not stop the 911 Commission from
investigating & answering 70%
90% of the questions posed by the victims & their relatives or
omitting umpteen high witness testimony from the 911
Commission’s “Final Report”, including omitting
ALL references to
the free fall speed destruction of Building 007. The
real 911 “terrorists” did the steel evidence destruction to
cover-up their false flag “ Inside job” treason of which gave a
pretext for never ending “profitable war on terror” whilst
reducing civil liberties & human rights.