he Queen"
illustrates how the
public is lulled to sleep with Mother Goose stories.
The drama rests entirely on Queen Elizabeth II's
refusal to speak publicly after the death of
Princess Diana in 1997; and how, under pressure from
a grieving nation, she gallantly rose to the
occasion.
Nominated for "Best Picture," the movie doesn’t
mention she had good reason to be reticent.
Helen Mirren won for "Best Actress" but if Mohammed
Fayed is right, Elizabeth II deserves the Oscar.
She orchestrated the hit
with her husband and son. "I want Charles
and Philip together in court." the father of Diana's
fiancé said recently. "These are the people who
ordered the murder."
Now that would have been a movie!
However in this one, Elizabeth wishes to "suffer
silently and with dignity" and "focus on her
grandsons' suffering." The tensions between the
Princess and the House of Windsor are only implied.
The movie is comforting. Elizabeth II really is a
good person, not the front for the world's greatest
criminal syndicate, dealing in drugs, arms,
prostitution and banking, according to Lyndon
LaRouche's book "Dope, Inc." (1992.)
Prince Charles, Prince Philip and Tony and Cherie
Blair come off as dedicated citizens and family
people, not inbred Masons, Satanists, traitors,
murderers, criminals perverts and crystal gazers
depicted by David Icke. (I reserve judgment on
reptilian shape shifters.)
After seeing "The Queen," I left the cinema feeling
with Robert Browning, "God is in His Heaven and
all is right with the world."
Our leaders are decent people
trying to do what's right! The old ladies in the
audience shouted, "pip, pip" when Elizabeth finally
saw the light. "Well done, your majesty!"
The movie critics felt the same way. Ninety eight
per cent gave the movie
positive reviews.
MURDER WILL OUT
However, in the case of murder we always ask, "Who
Benefits?"
After the divorce of Charles and Diana in 1991,
The London Daily Mail emphasized England "now
has effectively two Royal Houses—the House of
Charles and the House of Diana. In the first five
months of separation, Princess Diana attracted five
times as many spectators, twice as many reporters,
and more than twice as many photographers than her
husband." (Peter Fearon, "Buckingham Babylon"
p. 372)
Diana's death looks like an old fashioned Mafia hit,
a British dynastic spat. Didn't Queen Elizabeth I
have Mary Stuart beheaded in 1587? Diana threatened
the family business and had to be rubbed out.
According to
"This is London" (March 2) "Mr. Fayed has
been implacable in his insistence that Prince Philip
'masterminded' the couples' death. He says Dodi and
Diana planned to marry but the British establishment
could not accept the prospect of the mother of a
future king marrying a Muslim."
Or giving him a Muslim half-brother? There were
rumors she was pregnant. Diana expressed fears that
Charles would use MI-6 to arrange a car crash. There
is
evidence this is exactly what happened.
Imagine if this movie revealed the truth instead of
covered it up?
MOVIES FOR THE LOWER DEGREES
"In pre-movie days the business of peddling lies
about life was spotty and organized." Ben Hecht, a
veteran screenwriter wrote. Since then, "One basic
[movie] plot only has appeared daily...the triumph
of virtue and the overthrow of wickedness.... (A
Child of the Century, p. 468)
But, in real life, the bad guys have overthrown
virtue. The Cabbalist central banking mob finagled
control over national credit and is consolidating
this advantage into world tyranny. It has bought
everything and made success often synonymous with
serving the devil. It's goal is to hoard all the
world's resources, train serf, technocrat and
soldier classes, and dispose of the rest with
the blessing of the rent-a-professor/writer class.
They fund the movies that deceive, distract and
debilitate the boobs while they advance toward their
goal.
Society as a whole is organized like a secret
society (i.e. Freemasonry, Communism, Zionism,
Feminism.). Most members are not told the real
agenda. They are easier to manipulate with
idealistic sounding platitudes about freedom and
righteousness. The function of the mass media and
education: is to reinforce the official illusion:
how things "are supposed to be."
[In a famous interview with Sarah McClendon in
December 1992, George Bush Sr. admitted: "Sarah, if
the American people had ever known the truth about
what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be
chased down in the streets and lynched."]
To be hoaxed is probably the
essense of the modern human experience, but of
course few know it. Even those who rise in this
monstrous conspiracy are dupes. These "useful
idiots" provide a convincing facade. James Forrestal,
for example, was an investment banker who became
Truman's Secretary of Defense. When he realized the
Masonic bankers controlled Communism as well as
Capitalism, he couldn’t keep quiet. He was deemed
"insane" and thrown from the window of Bethesda
Naval Hospital. He was a good guy. He lost. There
are no movies about him.
"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
Richard Nixon eventually realized the same thing and
wanted to take back the USA. The CIA used The
Washington Post and Watergate to impeach him.
Yet the movie "All the President's Men"
tells a cock-and-bull story about the press bringing
down a corrupt ruler. The truth – a political hack
who reaches for greatness by defying the
Rockefellers--would have been wonderful. Even Oliver
Stone missed this story in his depiction of Nixon's
life.
Have you seen an honest movie about the murder of
George Patton or Huey Long? One about 9-11? What
about Margie Shroedinger, the woman who sued G.W.
Bush for rape and then "committed suicide" ? There
are dozens of
"good guys" murdered during the Clinton
Administration. Each one would make a great movie.
[At the 1991 Bilderberg meeting, David
Rockefeller thanked the media for covering up elite
plans for the "supranational sovereignty of an
intellectual elite and world bankers." “It would
have been impossible for us to develop our plan for
the world if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years."]
News now sees itself as entertainment. It serves a political and propaganda function. Entertainment is the main reason for our collective arrested development. People depend on it for information and guidance. Their souls cry out for beauty and a sense of what humans can aspire to. Instead they are fed a diet of deception and depravity.
If Mohammed Fayed is right, the movie "The Queen" covers up the murder of the future King of England's mother.
Hopefully the Internet will provide entertainment that nurtures rather than enslaves.
Dr. Henry Makow