ondering which president the vote riggers
will "choose" in 2008? Trying to sort through the poseurs and
players of the New World Order? Stumped to see whether your man
or woman measures up to the CFR stamp of approval?
No matter. Whoever wins in 2008 will either
serve his (or her) new masters, or suffer the same fate as that
idealistic loose cannon, JFK, shot for disobeying orders.
Whether Clinton or McCain is ordained or,
whether equally shifty Edwards, Obama, Giuliani, Romney, Condi
or anyone else "wins" in 2008, the recipient had better play by
the rules or suffer the same unfortunate fate.
Who makes the rules?
Certainly not the millions of concerned US
citizens seeking a good and decent man or woman to be the
nominal head of the government. Certainly not a few toothless
lobbies like AARP. Rather special interest groups--some of them
loyal to foreign governments--like AIPAC and AEI and CFR and the
corporate owners of those electronic voting machines, wield far
more decision-making power to pick the next prez than you or I
Following a preordained script, the "free
press" pimps for the handful of candidates allowed media
exposure. Sort of like picking that Heisman Trophy winner. That
trophy is annually presented to the "best" college football
player. A handful of candidates are presented, about five to
avoid confusion, and from these lucky few, a personable
performer is chosen. Usually one destined to fuck up in the big
And in the ensuing four years, eight years if
the pre-selected president performs according to script, the New
World Order will continue on its merry way, as it has for nearly
a century. Rewarding those who follow orders, punishing those
who follow their consciences.
Should that pre-selected president ever
decide to act, suddenly and irrationally, in the interest of
fairness or for the public good, woe be to he or she. A thousand
different threats (or rewards) can be applied to any disloyal
president allowed to delude himself into acting presidential.
The whispered phrase, "lone gunman," need only be uttered from
time to time, to insure a sense of proper restraint.
Why Prepare A President?
Because a well-prepared president is a known
quantity. Because a well-initiated, pre-programmed president is
less likely to fuck up the global agenda. Thus, at this moment,
numerous Council on Foreign Relations members are working
weekends and nights to insure you receive the best president
they can find. No loose cannons, reformers or idealists, thank
To their credit they've offered many
variations of the same model. Clinton is McCain in drag and
Giuliani is Clinton with chin whiskers and testicles but no
As odious as the offerings appear to be, they
all present some (minor) risk to the elites pulling the strings.
Suppose, just for a moment, the "winner" actually decides to
oppose his or her masters and act presidential. A network of
planners would be required to draw up contingency plans. A patsy
with three names would have to be found. A suitable location
would have to be selected. Some top snipers would have to be
contracted. Several top intelligence officials would have to be
informed. A handful of big bankers would have to shift funds to
offshore accounts. A smattering of media big shots would have to
be presented with the official story beforehand. All these
things take time and create headaches for the elites.
So whenever the top insiders at AIPAC or the
CFR or the Federal Reserve meet with Rudy or Hillary, they get
multiple assurances (probably in writing) that nothing they do
for the next four years---if selected--will run contrary to the
global blueprint of their group.
The rewards for following orders are
certainly tempting. Just look at the big book deals and speaking
fees for those who never deviated from the globalist agenda.
Thus we now see why Obama must shuck and jive
like a plantation field hand before his masters. Just as Colin
Powell did at the UN. Black candidates must shuck and jive, just
like white ones. Even the whitest candidates of all, Edwards and
McCain, must shuck and jive like Steppen Fetchit to the
plantation owners of the New World Order. That is why
Little-Miss-Stand-By Your-Man, Hillary Clinton pimps for war,
much like McCain, and why her gal pal, fellow Dem Pelosi, licks
ass over at the AIPAC convention, rather than kicks ass for her
constituents. Whether white or black, ALL are owned.
No candidate, whatever their party
affiliation, may be anointed unless they have proven their
loyalty to the powers behind the throne. They do that by voting
for the NWO agenda whenever possible. Whether voting for the
PATRIOT Act or voting for endless (and profitable) war on
terror, ALL the anointed candidates must serve the Order by
following orders, public be damned.
Forget what these candidates say to common
folk in public. Forget televised speeches. Whatever well-meaning
nonsense they spout in public speeches, as "sound bites," does
not diminish their loyalty to Bonesmen or Zionists or Wall
Street bankers. The elites know this well--it's all part of the
script--but most folks fall for the public lies. That was why
GWB sounded (almost) like a sincere, non-threatening country
bumpkin in the fall of 2000, rather than an immoral, trigger
happy, megalomaniac in the years since.
Those were all well known qualities to the
New World Order mentors who groomed both father and son years,
probably decades, in advance.
Global elitist and wordy new novelist,
Douglas Herman wrote The Guns of Dallas, about a NWO contract
killing. Email at