t is a shame that astronomers have nothing
better to do than believe absurd ideas while completely
ignoring fantastic, astronomical truths. The holy
International Astronomical Union has recently declassified
Pluto as a 'dwarf planet' and not a true planet. This
writer wants to make the case that Pluto is indeed a
planet. Do not throw Pluto into the cosmic trash bin.
The planet is a vital member of our Solar System.
Why is Pluto a planet? Many reasons; one of
the main reasons is its moon CHARON. Planet Mercury has no
satellite. Planet Venus has no moon. But, mighty Pluto,
this round ice-ball of a planet, does not just
possess a moon...it possesses a VERY SPECIAL MOON. Note the
following that was copied and pasted from an online
Pluto's rotation period
Charon's rotation period
Charon's orbital period
This writer has previously
written a posted article called 'Who Stops to Question the
Man in the Moon?' The piece was later entitled 'The
Gravity-Lock Myth.' It concerned the EXTREMELY unusual,
freak situation of our Moon always facing one side
toward the Earth. The fact that we never view the other
side of our satellite is an oddity we all grossly ignore.
We should, at some point, maybe thousands of years from now,
in a natural/normal world, slowly view the far side of
Luna...BUT WE NEVER WILL! Like a perfect clockwork, the far
side will forever remain occulted because the Moon rotates
in perfect sync with its revolution around us (orbital
period). Over time, some factor should change: the
satellite could slow down or speed up in its revolution; the
Moon could increase or decrease in its rotation on its
axis. Any one factor would alter the delicate balance of us
eternally observing that same, big face of a full moon.
explain the Earth/Moon relationship with something unproven
and untested called 'gravity-lock.' Yet, this writer
believes a more sensible explanation is an artificial
one. Something UNNATURAL (like an amazing, ancient
device) is compensating for numerous natural/powerful forces
that would alter the one side-always-facing-the-Earth
relationship. If you do not believe that leap of logic,
answer: Why aren't all the planets and their moons
gravity-locked? What makes our situation with Luna
different than almost every other planet/moon relationship
in the known universe? Why won't natural forces ever change
our perfect, in sync, lunar relationship? The best astro-physicists
on Earth cannot answer those basic questions. Instead, they
invent what they cannot explain and call it 'gravity-lock.'
Pluto and Charon
Why would some cosmic intelligence, alien or
whomever install a mechanism on the Moon in order to always
keep one side facing the Earth and one side never facing the
Earth? This is a planet with LIFE. Earth is not the only
planet with life, but it is the only known planet
teaming with life. Some people actually imagine a universe
where our planet is the ONLY planet with life. What better
place to have an orbiting, observational platform in the
disguise of a natural satellite?
There are ancient records of a moonless
Earth. It is not out of the question that when the great
pyramid-civilizations fell (which were not primitive in any
way) and chaos ensued in the aftermath of the destruction of
Atlantis...a very old Moon was literally BROUGHT IN, set in
perfect precision for the precise purpose of studying the
Earthly paradise, now gone so horribly wrong. [This
means human history is technologically backwards, but that
is another story].
Aliens could observe the Earth, from the
Moon's far side, and never be detected. The satellite would
block transmissions (radio silence) sent back to their home
world. Or, laser-perfect transmitters could be in place on
either side of our satellite that require the
facing of one side to the Earth. In conclusion, it is
incredibly odd that this large companion acts as it does
going around the one place in the cosmos with LIFE FORMS!
NOW CHECK THE ABOVE CHART OF PLUTO'S CHARON.
Not only does the very same situation of
Earth and Moon also happen with Pluto and Charon,
but there is the additional
(incredible) oddity of another in sync relationship.
Charon's period of rotation and revolution also matches THE
ROTATION PERIOD OF PLUTO! What
this boils down to is Charon would always be in the same
spot in the sky, forever fixed in the Plutonian sky!
If the exact situation happened here, people on one side of
Earth would never view our Moon unless they moved to the
other hemisphere which always viewed the satellite. Praise
Pluto! There must be some unfathomable reason that keeps
Charon motionless, relative to Pluto, that is far beyond our
understanding. But, please do not insist these are
merely NATURAL occurrences. Astronomical odds would be
highly stacked against you.
The second, main point as to why Pluto is a
real planet deals with exactly WHERE IT IS. Pluto
orbits at a distance from the sun exactly where a planet is
supposed to orbit the sun! Readers and all astronomers
out there: Look up a formula in Astronomy known as BODE'S
LAW. This writer also wrote articles called 'Bode's Law and
KBOs' and 'I Predicted the Distance to the New Planet!'
They encourage and endorse a reexamination of what
is currently thought of as an obsolete, old formula.
For nearly 100 years, Bode's Law was
considered a FACT. In fact, astronomers discovered
the Asteroid Belt, in the early part of the 19th Century,
because of Bode's Law. Exactly where a planet is
SUPPOSED to be, in the gap between the inner and outer
planets, are the many pieces of a pulverized planet.
Meteors are not everywhere in the Solar System. They are
primarily in between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. If we
go back in time, and magically view the formation of the
Asteroid Belt, we would discover the original 5th planet
which (in its perfect position within the Solar System) now
only exists in irregular bits.
The 19th Century astronomers searched in the
gap for the missing 5th planet. The distance from the sun
was 2.8 Astronomical Units. 18th Century Bode's Law says
there must be a planet at that distance: EVERY
PLANET IS IN A VIRTUALLY PERFECT, MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP
OUT FROM THE SUN. There is order in the Solar System.
Planetary distances from our sun were not the result of
random chance. Modern scientists tend to reject the idea of
planned order, artificialness or the acts of intelligent
life forms in the universe in favor of non-orderly
The following is a quote from my original
'In 1801, Ceres was
discovered at the 2.8 (A.U.) distance and thought to be the
missing Bodian planet. But, Ceres was too small and
irregular. In 1802, Pallas was discovered at the same
distance. Then, Juno in 1804 and Vesta in 1807 were found
to be rough planetoids at the 2.8 distance. Later, numerous
smaller objects were discovered and now thousands are known
to compose the Asteroid Belt...Ceres, with a diameter of 933
kilometers, is the largest fragment.'
Bode's Law was discarded with the discovery
of Neptune in 1846. The blue, gas giant did not fit the
pattern. Bode's little formula, among astronomers, was
discredited and hardly mentioned ever since. Here's my
point: PLUTO FITS THE BODE PATTERN! No scientist seems to
have noticed this oddity.
Maybe we should throw NEPTUNE out of our
Solar System and consider it an unplanet.
If we took Neptune out of its orbit, got rid
of all those asteroids between Mars and Jupiter, placed
Neptune there where the asteroids were...we would then,
suddenly, have perfect order in planetary distances out from
the sun. Pluto fits Bode's Law. But, no astronomer has
considered this because they think Bode has no relevance
past Uranus. No one has compared the trans-Uranus or the
next Bode's position of 38.8 A.U.s to Pluto's position from
the sun of 39.5 A.U.s. It is close and fits the old formula
as well as any of the classic planets.
Neptune and Sedna
This writer got an article posted that
predicted a true planet will be found at the next Bode's
position beyond Pluto. Carrying out the formula to the next
distance, we arrive at 77.2 Astronomical Units. At that
distance, within the Kuiper Belt, SEDNA was discovered!
Bode's Law still holds true for the next position beyond
Pluto. The following is another quote of mine mentioning
the NEXT Bode position:
'Let this writer PREDICT
here and now that one day ANOTHER planet will be
discovered beyond Sedna at the very next Bode’s Law
position. (Let’s take Bode out to the next distance
in the progression: We double 768 which equals
1536; add 4 = 1540 and divide by 10 equals 154
Astronomical Units. 154 times 93 million miles
and the final answer is 14.3 billion miles.
The next planet beyond Sedna in Bode’s progression
should be 14+ billion miles distant.)'
Pluto is where it should be in the pattern and so is the
Planet Sedna. In this writer's opinion, they are true
planets because of their POSITION in space. Possibly, a few
more real and extremely far planets orbit also at their
perfect distances in the pattern. Someone, something, so
very long ago PLACED the planets in their orbits! The
orbital patterns are perfect and could never have been the
act of random, chaotic forces. There is beauty and
perfection in the Solar System. Great expanses of time and
possibly actions of intelligent life in the
universe have certainly altered the original perfection of
the planets. Cosmic bodies could be more unnatural,
than natural in function and purpose.
an important planetary member in very good standing. Do not
tell the astrologers that Pluto is not a true planet; there
would be too many charts that would have to be changed.