t the time, much was made of the capture of
Saddam Hussein. Touted by the US government-controlled American
mainstream press as a fatal blow to the insurgency that would
lead to rejoicing in the streets of Baghdad, the reality, as we
have seen, has turned out to rather different. Iraqis, logically
enough, seem to be less concerned about Saddam's capture and
trial than about the fact that a brutal US military force of
occupation has essentially taken possession of their country and
its resources and has caused the deaths of 655,000 of their
fellow citizens.
After his initial capture in December 2003, Saddam was paraded
in front of the press at his first court appearance in July 2004
where he stood accused of up to 12 crimes, including the alleged
gassing of the Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988. But fate (and in
Iraq these days "fate" wears the red white and blue ) has
decreed that "Saddam" will not suffer the ignominy of answering
those particular charges because his first trial for the killing
of 148 people in a Shiite town in 1982 was enough, it seems, to
convict and sentence him to death. The sense of relief in the
White House over the fact that the "gassing" allegation will not
have to be dissected is surely palpable, given that, if Saddam
gassed anyone, it was with the chemical weapons supplied to him
by the US government.
When he first appeared in court in 2004, Saddam was weak and
pale and could be hardly heard. Strangely, the US military
instituted a severe clampdown on media coverage of the
proceedings which were not broadcast live. Frustrated members of
the press had to wait until after the event to receive just FOUR
minutes of audio and just a few seconds of video of the
occasion. Furthermore, Saddam's lawyers claimed that they had
been denied access to their client and that they had received
death threats from members of the Iraqi government. While no
mainstream media outlet at the time offered an explanation of
these strange occurrences, logic would suggest that there is
something about the man that appeared in court that the US
military did not want the Iraqi people and the rest of the
world, to see, or hear. It is one thing to present a few seconds
of specifically chosen footage of a possibly drugged or mind
programmed Saddam lookalike on television and thereby
half-convince Iraqis that knew Saddam that the person in court
is the real deal. It is a much more difficult task however to
make an impostor's voice sound like the real Saddam's. There is
also the danger that the impostor might suddenly and
unexpectedly reveal his true identity. It seems likely that it
was for this reason that the US military had to limit and edit
the audio coverage and then "clear" it for broadcast.