Last Updated:
Wednesday, September 20, 2006 06:47:45 PM
|
Wednesday, September 20, 2006 |
Experts Who Have Stated 9/11 Was A Controlled Demolition
StopLying.ca
Last Updated:
Wednesday, September 20, 2006 06:47:45 PM |
The WTC Collapses |
umerous
experts have stated that the collapse of the world trade centers
was, or looked like, controlled demolition:
* An
expert on demolition said that the
trade centers were brought down with explosives (and see TV
interview
here; both in Danish)
* Two structural engineers at a prestigious Swiss university
said that, on 9/11,
World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition
(translation
here)
* A Dutch demolition expert stated that
WTC 7 was imploded
* A U.S. professor of physics stated that the world trade
centers were
brought down by controlled demolition
* A U.S. professor of mechanical engineering argued that the
trade centers
were brought down with explosives
* Several U.S. structural engineers, such as
this one (second interview), have concluded that the
collapse of the Trade Centers on 9/11 cannot be explained by the
plane crashes and fires in the buildings
* An expert on why buildings collapse
said controlled demolitions make buildings fall straight down
(as opposed to falling over like a tree, which is what normally
happens when buildings collapse) because the vertical columns
are destroyed simultaneously by explosives, and "that's exactly
what it looked like and that's what happened" on 9/11
* The head of a national demolition association
stated that the collapse of the towers looked like a "classic
controlled demolition"
* A terrorism security expert used by many news organizations
asked, after commenting on the "secondary explosions",
"whether in fact there wasn't something else at the base of the
towers that in fact were the coup de grace to bring them to the
ground" (keep in mind that a controlled demolition involves
the use of explosives both at the base of the building and in
higher sections of the building)
Many other
experts have privately expressed skepticism of the official
explanation for why the Trade Centers collapsed. Hopefully, they
will also find the courage to come forward publicly.
|
|
Source: http://www.stoplying.ca/articles/sept06/expertsdemolition.htm
This
page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
- - - - - - - -
Disclaimer
- - - - - - - -
|
|
|