t the end of
Part 31 of my series on "Mental
Health, Education and Social Control," I referred to the
goal of global "integration" on the part of the Bush
administration. This was also the goal of the Clinton
administration and of the power elite in general. Their plan
has been globally to integrate regional economic
arrangements and then advocate their management by a World
Socialist Government. Currently there is an effort to
integrate the U.S., Canada and Mexico, and that is why
American politicians have no real desire to control our
borders despite their posturing to the contrary. Why else do
you think there are only about 11,000 border patrol agents
when even New York City alone has 37,000 police officers? To
show how the integration of two entities---the U.S. and
Europe---have already been occuring on a practical level, I
wrote the following article which was printed in the
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD on July 14, 1998 :
"The New
Transatlantic Agenda"
While the
implications of School-to-Work (STW) at the state and
national levels have been widely debated, not much has been
written about the international connections. On May 18,
1998, the White House released a statement at the conclusion
of the U.S.-European Summit in London, indicating that
"through the New Transatlantic Agenda (NTA), created in
1995, the United States and the European Union have focused
on addressing the challenges and opportunities of global
integration."
One part of
this "global integration" in 1995 was the agreement between
the U.S. and the European Community establishing a
cooperation program in higher education and vocational
education and training. The agreement, signed December 21 of
that year, called for "improving the quality of human
resource development...Transatlantic student mobility...and
thus portability of academic credits." In this regard, a
Joint Committee would reach decisions by consensus.
As part of the
NTA, the U.S. and European Union then convened a major
conference, "Bridging the Atlantic: People-to-People Links,"
on May 5-6,1997 calling for "thematic networks for
curriculum development," and further stating that in an
information-based global economy, "governments too are
obliged to adapt their economic, training and social welfare
programs." The conference final report noted that in the
U.S., ACHIEVE has been one of the organizations at the
forefront of the defining key issues in this regard and
developing strategies to address them. ACHIEVE has been
measuring and reporting each state's annual progress in
establishing internationally competitive standards, and
business leaders involved have indcated their commitment to
consider the quality of each state's standards when making
business location or expansion decisions.
The "Partners
in a Global Economy Working Group" of the conference
discussed "what redesigning of curricula is
required...(i.e., what career skills are
needed),...portability of skill certificates...and
institutionalizing cross-national learning/training
activites."
Most people
debating STW in the U.S. are familiar with the role of Marc
Tucker, president of the National Center on Education and
the Economy. He's also on the National Skill Standards Board
(NSSB), and on its website under international links, one
finds "Smartcards Project Forum," under which one reads:
"The Tavistock Institute and the European Commission are
working on a feasibility study to research the affect of
using Smartcards in competence accreditation. The study will
be carried out in the USA and parts of Europe." The project
involves assessing and validating students' skills, with
information placed on personal skills Smartcards, which
"become real passports to employment."
If without a
passport one cannot enter a country, does this mean that
without a skills passport one may not be able to get a job
in the future?
In October
1997, the Tavistock Institute (and Manchester University)
completed the final report for the European Commission, and
described in a report summary were the relevancy of Goals
2000, SCANS (U.S. Department of Labor "Secretary's
Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills") typology with its
"profound implications for the curriculum and training
changes that this will require," valid skills standards and
portable credentials "benchmarked to international standards
such as those promulgated by the International Standards
Organization (ISO)."
The report
summary went on to say that "there is increasing attention
being focused on developing global skill standards and
accreditation agreements," and there will be "partnerships
between government, industry, and representatives of worker
organizations...(and) a high degree of
integration...embedding skills within the broader context of
economic and social activity, and specifically within the
areas of secondary education, work-based learning and local
and regional economic development....The NSSB, Goals 2000,
STW Program are all combining to act as a catalyst to
promote the formation of partnerships to develop skills
standards. In this regard, a system like O*Net can be seen
as the 'glue' that holds everything together."
O*Net is a new
occupational database system sponsored by the U.S.
Department of Labor's Employment and Training
Administration, and is being piloted in Texas, South
Carolina,