Another Staged Charade From The War Criminals
by Paul Joseph Watson, May 26, 2006
Last Updated:
Saturday, May 27, 2006 06:16:53 PM |
Bush/Blair press conference feigns Iraqi
support for Globalist occupation forces
|
Paul Joseph Watson |
ast night's Bush/Blair
press conference was the latest in a long line of carefully
choreographed, staged and scripted, PR charades designed to fool the
watching audience into thinking that there was anyone outside of the
Globalist coalition of the killing and their dwindling army of
sycophantic cheerleaders that actually supported the never ending
occupation of Iraq.
White House press
conferences are as staged as an
Arnold Schwarzenegger photo op, with scripted
questions that are known beforehand and scripted answers.
None more so than Bush's
'humble' admission that his "bring 'em on" challenge wasn't exactly
going to win hearts and minds in the middle east, for which the
lapdog media are slavishly back-slapping Bush this morning.
The last time Bush was
asked if he had made any mistakes at a White House press conference
was April 13th 2004. On this occasion Bush's reaction was a national
embarrassment to rival trying to open a locked door in China, and an
insight into the true nature of these phony media spectacles.
Anyone who watched the TV
footage witnessed the
embarrassing sight of Bush pausing for at least
five seconds and saying absolutely nothing. Bush's admonition that
the question should have been written 'ahead of time' (like the
rest) proves that this was an impromptu question in an otherwise
carefully scripted briefing.
Bush's bizarre response
caused waves of speculation that his answers were being fed through
to him via an ear piece and this became a major talking point during
the Bush-Kerry election debates.
"John, I'm sure historians
will look back and say, gosh, he could've done it better this way or
that way. You know, I just -- I'm sure something will pop into my
head here in the midst of this press conference, with all the
pressure of trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet," said
Bush as he puffed out his cheeks, fumbled for words, and faltered
like a deer in the headlights.
During a prime time press
conference on March 6th 2003, a flustered Bush admitted that the
event was "scripted" after a reporter interrupted him looking down
at his notes to see which journalist to next call upon. The word
'scripted' was later
excised from numerous mainstream media transcripts
of the event.
Bush's infamous staged
conversation with US troops ordered to
paint a rosy picture of
conditions in Iraq was exposed when video tape of Allison Barber,
deputy assistant defense secretary,
coaching the troops on what their choreographed
answers would be was aired.
Last night's charade was
kept carefully within controlled parameters as Bush and Blair
discarded every question with the same canned response.
Blair's insistence on
ducking questions about the illegality of invading Iraq by
dismissing it as past tense and harping on about how we must forget
about that and concentrate on rebuilding the country needs to be put
in its proper context.
This would be like breaking
into your neighbors house, killing his wife and children, smashing
up the place and then telling the police that the reasons and
consequences of doing all this are not important because the house
is a mess and in need of renovation.
Hailing the installation of
another puppet government as a turning point, Bush and Blair
carefully avoided questions about when troops will be withdrawn.
Press speculation that a large scale withdrawal is imminent has been
heard before and always turns out to be baseless. The only point at
which troops will be withdrawn is when they are needed to bludgeon
another broken backed third world country in the name of democracy.
Blair's indignant preaching
about Al-Qaeda in Iraq spoiling his Straussian vision of global
democracy (international world government by force) was propped up
by Bush's reference to the
mythical Al-Zarqawi presence and the
determination of the terrorists to succeed.
The fact is that the
'insurgents' are comprised almost entirely of Iraqis and
half of Iraqis actually support their goals. On
the other hand
polls have shown that Bush and Blair's imperial
occupation forces garner no more than 18% approval.
Iraqis
say the country is worse than it was under
Saddam and former
Prime Minister Ayad Allawi said human rights
abuses had eclipsed those of the deposed Hussein.
If Chinese troops occupied
Los Angeles, bombed villages, told citizens they couldn't re-enter
their homes without
chipped ID cards, engaged in
untold massacres, set up
torture camps, took control of all
free media and
imprisoned anyone who protested their presence,
would Americans who fought back be characterized as insurgents and
terrorists?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This page may
contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such
material available in my efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Disclaimer
- - - - - - - -
|