o you ever feel frustrated and powerless over the escalating world problems?

I receive a lot of emails from people who have read my website and others as well and now feel they have a grasp of what is going on in the world, but they feel hopeless, helpless and sometimes fearful. Even when I refer them to my spiritual section and even when they like my spiritual ideas, they still want to do something 'more direct' as well.

I know one thing EVERYONE can do, which is extremely helpful. Help me research!

I have decided I want my website to be a pilot for this idea. Personally, I am so tired of people who are doing hardcore research  (top shot 'conspiracy' researchers), sitting in their ivory tower and research 'in secret' and don't let anybody in until the research on a certain topic is over. Then they either put the result on a website or in a book. People read it and get enlightened, but they feel they're not 'part of it'; they are just the receivers of information. Some may even think they have some ideas to add to what they read, but never get a chance, unless they create a website of their own, which is not always an option. Of course, people can go out and spread the word to their neighbors and friends, but I often hear that some of those who try are not always very successful, because their environment is still asleep and doesn't want to be awakened. This is quite common. Therefore, a better way for people who have encountered this problem would be to share information with already established researchers, who have a website with a decent amount of visitors, like myself.

It's nothing wrong with doing ones own research like most 'hot researchers' do, but if an 'outside researcher' comes up with an idea and tells the famous, 'top researcher' about the idea, he either doesn't get a reply, his information is used as if the famous researcher had found it out him/herself, or you get an email back criticizing your idea and it's then rejected without much further consideration. On occasion, they may even be arrogant about it.

Sometimes it may be justified to criticize and reject, but in my own case I've noticed too many times that later on the idea I presented actually had value and someone else eventually 'steals' the idea. I never make a big deal about that on a personal level, because it's not about me, but about the information in itself. The number one importance is that the info gets out there; more important than who came up with it. My problem with it is the ego part, though, which can rapidly escalate and the researcher will be wide open to accept disinformation, unwittingly so, because the (dis)information is 'new' and hasn't been presented before. It makes him/her vulnerable and the researcher can then be easily discredited by the same sources who gave the disinformation. The ego part is something we all have to work on, and it's VERY important that we do! 

What I've noticed is that ego is big in this field (and again, this does not apply to everybody). It's almost like a fraternity of its own, where the famous ones scratch each others back and link each other up back and forth. You're either in the club or you're not. Those who are not in the club are rarely paid attention to and have to work very hard to get their word out on their own, because they don't get much help from those they expect to support them.

I am not saying this to criticize or attack anybody in particular; it's a human thing, but it's dangerous when you research for the truth. And at any time in your research, you have to be able to say to yourself "I was wrong" and start all over if necessary. Don't hold on to old ideas that are shown not to work just because you once presented them, is my motto. Show you're human and make mistakes. Most people are okay with that, as long as you admit to them in public and start all over. Sometimes I get an email with an upset person, pointing out something from an article that he/she knows is incorrect and then goes on raging about "do your research, dude!" This reaction may be justified to some degree, because there are researchers out there who refuse to admit they were wrong and it's frustrating for people who know the researcher actually was incorrect. Therefore, the person already has a preconception of me being the same way. He/she feels a need to point out the error, but doesn't expect me to do anything about it - thus the rage.

I believe that if you show you're honest even when you're wrong, people will start trusting you.

I want people to feel they participate in spreading the truth! I have the website with all these visitors, but you who are reading from it may have information I don't know about, which I can use on this forum. If you do, be my co-researcher and send me stuff you think is of importance. And please don't sit on it and doubt if you should send it or not, thinking I may laugh it off as stupid. I want to know what you have, whether I can use it or not. There is no "stupid information", just information. I want to look at it, whatever it is, and make up my own mind about it. And if I post it, I am happy to include your name as a co-researcher, or you can be anonymous, knowing that I NEVER reveal my sources, unless the source allows me to do so in writing.

So how should we do this the easiest way?

I would like you, when you read an article on my site, to think about if you have some additional information to what's in the article, and if so, send it to me, even if it's just bits and pieces or a single sentence. It can be important! Or, you have information that debunks an article? Wonderful! Send it!

Do you have a topic in mind that you can't seem to find on my website, but think would fit in? Email me and ask me if I am interested in that topic (before you start researching it or writing about it, if the purpose is to post it on MY site. This saves you time, in case I say I'm not interested). If I say yes, feel free to write an article or research the topic and send the result to me. Never feel intimidated! I never intimidate people - I encourage people.

Sometimes, like I did recently with the article, Who is Supriem Rockefeller?, I started out with very little knowledge about this man and posted the article for everybody to read, although it was far from finished. Then I let people email me with information they had on the subject and I updated the article like a blog, with the today's date exposing the latest news on the subject, then I added new updates as soon as new info came in and so on. This showed to be very successful, and I could also concentrate on other research on the side, while you, the readers, gave me valuable info on Supriem Rockefeller. This is a format I may use on occasion as well, because it takes a huge burden off of me.

But what about disinformation? Isn't this way of researching opening up doors for disinformation agents? Sure it does, but that door is always open anyway, and we just have to try and connect the dots, as always. Nothing is different.

Another reason I want to try out this pilot is because I don't belong to a research group. I am entirely on my own, so to speak. I have a family and I have a full-time job on top of researching this stuff. I get up very early in the morning to have peace and quite to research, and I never get sufficient sleep. Even with these morning hours, understandably, there is only so much I can do, but so much I would LIKE to be able to do. This is where you come in! If we all together help creating a great Illuminati News website that will enlighten people all over the world, we all feel we did something about this situation. We educate people!

If you are interested in this and have some information to share, don't hesitate to contact me. Don't be discouraged if it takes a few days sometimes for me to reply. As you can imagine, I am drowning in emails. Also, don't be discouraged if I happen to say I can't use your material for some reason. Please don't give up - next time you may have just the info I'm looking for.

Thanks my friends,
Wes

---

Want your opinion to be heard? Make a comment and have it posted here, uncensored and unedited! as long as it's written in a civilized manner. Write me an email and put the same title in your email subject line as the name of the article you want to comment on. You can be anonymous if you like, or write under a pseudonym. Wes Penre.

---

Important Definitions:

[i] ^ The word Illuminati means 1. People claiming to be unusually enlightened with regard to a subject. 2. Illuminati: Any of various groups claiming special religious enlightenment.  Latin illmint, from pl. of illmintus, past participle of illminre, to light up. See illuminate.

These definitions are taken from "The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language".

Like the definitions say, any group which considers itself "enlightened" could rightfully call itself the Illuminati. So is also the case. If you google "The Illuminati", you will find quite a few groups claiming this name.

It can be confusing, so before we continue, I want to make very clear that the Illuminati we are discussing here is NOT a benevolent secret society who wants to create peace and harmony in this world by helping to bring freedom to the people. Such a benevolent group DOES exist and happens to call themselves "The Illuminati", and is actually the original group using this name.

They have been working behind the scenes for a very long time to help humanity free themselves from the chains we have been stuck in for thousands of years. Unfortunately, the Powers That Be, the evil puppet masters running this show on war and destruction, infiltrated the truth movement already in an early stage by adopting  the term Illuminati to describe themselves, thus using the same name as the original benevolent group. This to further confuse the matter.

Now, almost all researchers (including myself) have adopted the term "Illuminati" to describe the Dark Side, and by doing so, we have to a certain degree unwittingly helped discrediting the benevolent group with this original name and made it harder for them to get the job done.

Therefore, I will let this definition follow each and every article posted on this website from now on in an effort to try to clear up the confusion. I apologize that so many people now have mixed up the groups, and I have partly, but ignorant to this fact until recently, been responsible for that.

The point is that the Illuminati I am exposing here is the super-rich Power Elite with an ambition to maintain the slave society they have been working so hard to accomplish over the millennia!

[ii] ^ The term "New World Order", just like the term "Illuminati", has been used by at least two different groups, meaning basically two different things:

1) A goal to put an end to the current Order (called "The Old World Order" - OWO), which is considered evil and anti-survival, and therefore the current power elite needs to be overthrown and their Old World Order to be destroyed and replaced with a benevolent "New World Order". The goal is a humanity-friendly One World Government. The means putting an end to the current Old World Order with violence, if necessary.

Personally, I don't agree with using violence to stop the Old World Order, as I am more into a spiritual solution (see elsewhere on my website), but I want to make my readers aware of that there IS a group calling themselves "The Illuminati", who want to replace the current Old World Order (the Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc.) with a benevolent New World Order, where people are no longer slaves to this Power Elite.

2) A goal to create a micro-chipped society, so that they more easily can maintain the current Order that they have created throughout the millennia. This is the "New World Order" the Bush's, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and others are supporting and working on maintaining. This is also the "New World Order" I am fighting against via this website.

Just like in the case with the term "Illuminati", this second group has confused researchers and truth seekers by using the basically benevolent term "New World Order" for their negative and malevolent goals. This has made it harder for the Resistance to operate, because both "The Illuminati" and the "New World Order" have been used as a propaganda for the Dark Side and everything connected to these two terms now are perceived as negative.

If we really look at it, it's nothing "new" with what this Power Elite officially calls the "New World Order", but no more than an effort to hold on to the Old World Order they have already created.

I hope this to some degree makes things clearer.