Charles L. Kyte, III
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1124
New York, NY 10029
(212) 241-9386
----------
INTELLI-CONNECTION A Security Division of IBM
1200 Progress Way
Armonk, New York 11204
CONFIDENTIAL
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION ONLY
LEVEL 9 COMMUNICATION
2020 NEURAL CHIP IMPLANT
The
control of crime will be a paramount concern in the 21st Century. We must be
ready with our security products when the demand for them becomes popular. Our
Research and Development Division has been in contact with the Federal Bureau of
Prisons, the California Department of Corrections, the Texas Department of
Public Safety, and the Massachusetts Department of Correction to run limited
trials of the 2020 neural chip implant. We have established representatives of
our interests in both management and institutional level positions within these
departments.
Federal regulations do not yet permit testing of implants on prisoners, but we
have entered into contractual testing of our products. We have also had major
successes in privately owned sanitariums with implant technology. We need,
however, to expand our testing to research how effective the 2020 neural chip
implant performs in those identified as the most aggressive in our society.
Limited testing has produced a number of results.
In California, several prisoners were identified as members of the security
threat group, EME, or Mexican Mafia. They were brought to the health services
unit at Pelican Bay and tranquilized with advanced sedatives developed by our
Cambridge, Massachusetts laboratories. The implants procedure takes 60-90
minutes depending upon the experience of the technician. We are working on a
device which will reduce that time by as much as 60%. The implants on 8
prisoners yielded the following results:
- Implants served as surveillance monitoring device for threat
group activity.
- Implants disabled two subjects during an assault on
correctional staff.
- Universal side effects in all 8 test subjects revealed that when
the implant was set to 116 MHz all subjects became lethargic
and slept on an average of 18-22 hours per day.
- All subjects refused recreation periods for 14 days during the
116 MHz test evaluation.
- 7 of the 8 subjects did not exercise, in the cell or out of the
cell
and 5 of the 8 subjects refused showers up to three days at
time.
- Each subjects was monitored for aggressive activity during the
test period and the findings are conclusive that 7 out of the 8
test subjects exhibited no aggression, even when provoked.
- Each subject experienced only minor bleeding from the nose
and ears 48 hours after the implant due to initial adjustment.
- Each subject had no knowledge of the implant for the test
period and each implant was retrieved under the guise of
medical treatment.
It should be noted that the test period was for less than two months. However,
during that period substantial data was gathered by our research and development
team which suggests that the implants exceed expected results. One of the major
concerns of Security and the R & D team was that the test subject would discover
the chemical imbalance during the initial adjustment period and the test would
have to be scrubbed. However, due to advanced technological developments in the
sedatives administered, the 48 hour adjustment period can be attributed to
prescription medication given to the test subjects after the implant procedure.
One of the concerns raised by R & D was the cause of the bleeding and how to
eliminate that problem. Unexplained bleeding might cause the subject to inquire
further about his "routine" visit to the infirmary or other health care
facility.
The security windfall from the brief test period was enormous. Security
officials now know several strategies employed by the EME that facilitate the
transmission of illegal drugs and weapons into their correctional facilities.
One intelligence officer remarked that while they cannot use the information
they have in a court of law that they know who to watch and what outside
"connections" they have. The prison at Soledad is now considering transferring
three subjects to Vacaville where we have ongoing implant research. Our
technicians have promised that they can do three 2020 neural chip implants in
less than an hour. Soledad officials hope to collect information from the trio
to bring a 14 month investigation into drug trafficking by correctional officers
to a close.
Essentially the implants make the unsuspecting prisoner a walking talking
recorder of every event he comes into contact with. There are only five
intelligence officers at the Commissioner of Corrections who actually know the
full scope of the implant testing.
In Massachusetts, the Department of Correction has already entered into high
level discussions about releasing certain offenders to the community with the
2020 neural chip implants.
This is as much information that I have received on this topic so far. I am
awaiting more and will report when I get it.
Bobby Castillo,
American Indian Movement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Prison Activist Resource Center / PeaceNet Prison Issues Desk \ PO Box 3201
Berkeley CA 94703 - ph:510/845.8813 fx:845.8816 /
<parcer@igc.apc.org> / <prisondesk@igc.apc.org> \
+++ RESOURCES FOR ORGANIZERS, EDUCATORS, ACTIVISTS +++ /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dear prisonact-list subscribers (and others),
A few days ago we posted a message of an UNCONFIRMED report about prisoners
being subjected to neural implants. we did so just to see if there were any
folks who could confirm the report. since posting, we spoke with the original
posters. here's what some list subscribers responded, and following that is what
Bobby Castillo had to say about it by phone day before yesterday.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Has ANYONE been in touch with AIM and others about the authenticity and veracity
of the purported IBM memo on 2020 chip implants in prisoners. If it is true,
action should be taken immediately; if it is false, the rumor must be stopped
immediately.
G Barrenador
Baltimore ABC
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Arnold Erickson <aerick@wco.com>:
>Federal regulations do not yet permit testing of implants on prisoners,
>but we have entered into contractual testing of our products.
Neither does California law. Although I do not have any great love for either
the Department of Corrections or IBM, it is hardly likely that the two have
entered into contractual testing.
>In California, several prisoners were identified as members of the
>security threat group, EME, or Mexican Mafia. They were brought to the
>health services unit at Pelican Bay and tranquilized with advanced
>sedatives developed by our Cambridge, Massachusetts laboratories.
Given the fact that the medical department at Pelican Bay has been under intense
scrutiny by the federal court and the court monitor -- to the extent that the
court discovered a doctor was doing personal business rather than treating
patients -- this is even less likely.
The second thing I have noticed about the alleged confidential memo is that the
zip code for Amronk New York is wrong. Amronk is 10504. The
11204 number appears to be in Brooklyn. You would think IBM would know their
correct zipcode if the memo were real.
AND HERE'S ARNOLD'S ROUND-UP ON THIS ISSUE (thanks Arnold, for your
perserverance)...
A message was distributed that purported to be a confidential memo from IBM
dealing with a "2020 neural chip implant" that was placed in prisoners at
Pelican Bay State Prison. This memo is inconsistent and inaccurate in several
respects.
1. It states that federal regulations do not permit testing implants on
prisoners, but they have entered into contractual testing with other agencies.
The California Department of Corrections is identified as one of those agencies.
Such tests would violate California law. I doubt if either the Department of
Corrections or IBM would enter into such a contract.
2. The memo states that experiments were done at Pelican Bay. Of all the
prisons, this is the least likely to be used for secret experiments. The medical
department has been under intense court scrutiny. It is unlikely that a secret
experiment would remain hidden.
3. The memo identifies an IBM security division at Amronk, New York. It lists a
zip code of 11204. This is a Brooklyn zip code. Amronk's code is 10504.
4. The memo identifies intelligence officers at the commission of corrections in
California. California does not have a commissioner. A high level memo would be
accurate in this respect.
I also doubt that such a memo would refer to "Vacaville" rather than the
California Medical Facility.
In short, the memo is inaccurate, inconsistent. I find it unbelievable.
Arnold Erickson
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bobby Castillo of AIM reports (via phone Fri 8 April) that he got the report
from an organization in Colorado Springs called N.A.T.I.V.E.S. as well as Doret
Kollerer of North Coast Xpress. A message came with it at the time that it may
be bogus and should be checked out. Nuerologists that he has spoken to have
expressed similar opinions. He may now (Tuesday) have more information. Bobby
can be reached at: 415-386-4373.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Of course the questions now are:
1. If the report is exagerated, what's the truth?
2. If it's bogus, who originated it?
Stay tuned,
eli for the Prison Issues Desk
---------------------------------------------------------------
Prison Activist Resource Center / PeaceNet Prison Issues Desk \ PO Box 3201
Berkeley CA 94703 - ph:510/845.8813 fx:845.8816 /
<parcer@igc.apc.org> / <prisondesk@igc.apc.org> \
+++ RESOURCES FOR ORGANIZERS, EDUCATORS, ACTIVISTS +++ /
---------------------------------------------------------------
For progressive & radical info on prison issues, send e-mail \
to <parc-info@igc.apc.org> for details on many resources. /
SEE OUR WEB SITE --> http://www.igc.apc.org/prisons \
SEE OUR GOPHER --> gopher.igc.apc.org, choose #3, then #14 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Updated/Revised:
Tuesday, April 06, 2004 06:07:46 -0700