How Media
Splurge in Pornography - Often Our Children Are the Target
by Hazel
PORNSEC
Most
tabloids, adverts and music videos are now soft porn, without exception and
gradually getting raunchier…this we take for granted, while kid’s programming is
downright Satanic, with Buffy and Harry. If you want a picture of the New World
Order watch the Cartoon Network, it’s all in there… occultism, spies, doomsday
viruses, evil megalomaniacs, biometrics and cyborg soldiers, but yesterday I saw
something which disturbed me to such an extent, that this rant is the result.
Sometimes I don’t know why I
bother, since I tend to state the obvious, at least I
hope it is… but the incremental
methodology of the demonic press means that one barely notices that the bar has
been lowered again, until they
are rubbing your nose in it. In this case it is the subtle transition of
hard-core pornography to the front cover of men’s glossy magazines, photos which
were once reserved for the inside of seedier publications.
The new rag which caught my
eye, I couldn’t miss it, it was in my face the moment I stepped into the
newsagents, is called ‘Fox’ and was placed “innocently” between Cosmopolitan and
Elle, not out of sight on the top shelf. The front page spread featured a “fun”
close up of nude models engaged in an explicit lesbian sex act, I could go into
detail but you can use your imagination! It was in full view of everyone in the
shop, including my nine year-old daughter and five year-old son.
It
seemed to go over the children’s
heads but as a woman, I felt disgusted and degraded by this public display of
obscenity and took it upon myself to slide the offending magazine behind
Cosmopolitan, hoping the shopkeeper saw me and got the message… this is just not
“Kosher” to some people. Now, I’m not a prude, not by a long shot, as one or two
of my male correspondents could testify (please
don’t!) but my embarrassment over women being depicted this way to
all and sundry made me wonder…
How would men react if their
sexuality was laid bare? What’s good for the goose and all that… Imagine; daddy
pops into the corner shop with his children to buy them a treat and ‘Pornsec’ is
laying on the counter revealing a naked man in an advanced stage of arousal, and
to make it comparable to the female equivalent, he would have to be receiving
gratification from another “stud.” Would you not feel you were being humiliated
and your masculinity debased? But then, maybe that’s where it’s going because
no-one objects or complains.
Perhaps in time, children and
animals will be introduced to the mix, as paedophilia, bestiality and
homosexuality are normalised and encouraged
via the internet. And no, I am not a homophobe, I have gay friends,
but that does not mean you should have it rammed down your throat! However, I do
baulk at the sexualising of youngsters who have no interest in the subject
whatsoever until puberty, prior to that it’s something to titter about, unless
you’ve been abused.
Pornography, if at all, ought
to be a matter of personal choice, not compulsory, yet the Liberal Democrats see
it as a useful tool in sex education and a harmless “safety valve” - not
exploitation. But it’s not everyone’s ‘cup of tea,’ some folk are not that way
inclined and have got better things to do, like gardening… not necessarily
uphill. Sex between consenting adults is natural and wholesome, I don’t have a
problem with that, (my problem is finding a
decent partner) but it is also intimate and private, or it
should be!
If ‘Fox’ magazine is now
typical of what is acceptable in the mainstream media, we are almost at the
bottom of the moral barrel, how much further are you prepared to let it go…
all the way? We need another
‘Mary Whitehouse’ she
knew where to draw the line - and must be turning in her grave! I feel a job
opportunity coming on… although, whoever chooses to fill this vacant
‘missionary’ position has got their work cut out for them, because there are
very few boundaries or taboos left.
- Hazel
Created & Posted:
Thursday, January 15, 2004 07:17:36 -0800