How Pop &
Rock Music is Used to Manipulate Us by Wes
Penre, June 13, 2005
On
occasion I get an angry letter where the person calls me both this and
that name for writing popular music down. The most common objection is
that "rock music is rebellious. It does exactly the opposite from
what you claim on your crappy website". Something to that effect.
Like I've said elsewhere, I understand that reaction, because in a
corrupt world we like to believe there is something we can hold on to
that is working against suppression, oppression and corruption. I too
wish it was rock music, but now I know better.
People say the music of the 60's was an awakening and
a way to oppose the oppressive war mongers within the Government. But let me
tell you this: that was exactly what the Illuminati-owned record
companies wanted us to believe. Instead it gave us drugs, obsession on
free sex and eventually apathy. The consequences were quite devastating.
After the apparent awakening in the 60's and early 70's, the youth fell
down into a deep "coma", often lost in drugs and disillusions, thinking
there is no way to change things. The hippie movement had failed and
most of the true hippies gave up and started feeding the system they had
opposed by becoming bankers, doctors, lawyers etc...
But what was REALLY happening? Well, what people in
general don't think about is that music is vibrations. What frequency
the music vibrates on is directly determining what emotions and
reactions you get from it. Classical music has its own vibration, which
often lifts us up spiritually. Rock music has another frequency, hip-hop
another and rap music yet another. Do we really think we have a choice
as of what to listen to, as a society? Are we really that blind that we
think that we, the consumers, are setting the trends? No, my friends,
the trends are set by the Illuminati owned music industry, where they
know exactly how frequencies work - they have the best scientists
working for them, so what can we expect? One day, pop and rock is what
they want us to listen to, the next day the trend is punk rock, then rap
and then back to rock in an endless stream. Almost within a blink of an
eye, the music you listened to yesterday is now not hip anymore and you
are not supposed to listen to it, unless you are a nerd or something.
They, the Illuminati-owned music companies, are the ones who decide what
we want to listen to, and don't get fooled to believe it's anything else
than that. The music they produce vibrates on the frequency they want us
to vibrate on for the moment to enhance the New World Order Agenda! And
that's it. They want to keep us on a certain frequency, where they can
control us as a whole.
Let's look at this example. The other day I noticed
in the local paper that a now aged David Lee Roth is
coming
to town pretty soon. First of all, the huge picture on the front of the
paper showed a David Lee Roth, about 15 years younger. Of course, that
sells better than showing him the way he looks now. However, how did
they expose him? Well, on the picture he was dressed in tight leather
pants a la Jim Morrison, and instead of having a zipper, he had tiny
strings to keep his pants together. Well, the strings apparently didn't
do a good job, because the part of the pants where the zipper should
have been was wide open all the way down to the root of his penis. Then,
of course, his shirt must have accidentally popped all the buttons,
because his chest was totally bare, and just by coincidence his pose was
sexually offensive.
For you who have listened to Van Halen know what kind
of music they played and what kind of songs David Lee Roth was singing.
The low vibration rock riffs together with Roth's play on leather sex
[sadomasochism] sure gives a certain message, doesn't it? If nothing
else, the music creates aggression and keeps us trapped with sex and
drugs. Where is the freedom with that? Does it liberate us and make us
more enlightened, or the opposite? There is no secret that Van Halen and David Lee Roth especially,
were involved in wild drug and sex orgies. You might say that is their
business, and if they weren't famous musicians and opinion leaders, I
would agree. Now, mass media made sure everybody knew about
their behavior, and the full effect of their music became full circle - they
set, or rather made sure, the correct rock trend continued as planned (sex, drugs
and rock & roll). The record company was thrilled, I'm sure, happy to
have such dedicated musicians on their payroll.
What I am trying to say here is that we are being
used. If you think that we are the ones to decide whom to listen to and
who is going to make it BIG because WE decide which music to buy, you
are mistaken. It's called marketing, and they are geniuses in
that field. Rock music was NEVER meant to enlighten us or make us
rebels. If you think about it and do your own research - find out who
owns the music business, and who owns the labels on which the artists
you like make their recordings? Do you think that those guys would let
rock musicians enlighten us? No, music is all about vibrations, and THEY
decide which frequency the music should vibrate on for the moment.
Many people now accept that the Illuminati is behind
the New World Order, and they realize what is being done to us all, but
some of the same people who accept this as a fact, refuse to accept that
the music industry is corrupt. Come on, it is once again the same people
pulling the strings! Anyone can check that out for themselves by doing
their own research. It's no secret, and it's just a matter of following
the thread.
We also need to remember that those people who are
pulling the strings are not thinking like you and I. For most of us it
is quite hard to confront evil; we rather say the particular evil event
does not exist, or "it's probably not that bad". It's normal human
behavior, and this makes it very difficult for us to see what's really
going on. The ones that orchestrate all this know how the human psyche
works and they are capable of producing something (may it be music or
something else) pretending that the purpose for it is something else
than what it actually is, and most of the times we swallow the bait...
Like I've said elsewhere on this website, I am not
trying to make anyone stop listening to music, I am just trying to make
people
aware. I am still listening to some of this music I am here revealing, just
because I like it. However, with this new insight, I don't buy into the
effects they are covertly trying to create. Knowledge is power and what
you know for certain can't negatively effect you in the same way it once
did..
On
occasion I get an angry letter where the person calls me both this and
that name for writing popular music down. The most common objection is
that "rock music is rebellious. It does exactly the opposite from
what you claim on your crappy website". Something to that effect.
Like I've said elsewhere, I understand that reaction, because in a
corrupt world we like to believe there is something we can hold on to
that is working against suppression, oppression and corruption. I too
wish it was rock music, but now I know better. 
coming
to town pretty soon. First of all, the huge picture on the front of the
paper showed a David Lee Roth, about 15 years younger. Of course, that
sells better than showing him the way he looks now. However, how did
they expose him? Well, on the picture he was dressed in tight leather
pants a la Jim Morrison, and instead of having a zipper, he had tiny
strings to keep his pants together. Well, the strings apparently didn't
do a good job, because the part of the pants where the zipper should
have been was wide open all the way down to the root of his penis. Then,
of course, his shirt must have accidentally popped all the buttons,
because his chest was totally bare, and just by coincidence his pose was
sexually offensive.
