Beatles, Rock'n'Roll & Mind
Control
Ben Gunn, 1999
Home
The Sinister Controllers of Music and Art
The Occult Background to Rock Music
Beatles, Rock&Roll And Mind Control
Mind Control in the Field of Art
The Satanic Roots of Rock
How Artists are used by the Illuminati
Pentagon Runs Hollywood
Artists under the Magnifying Glass
Free Books
Feedback from Visitors
_______________________________________ | |||||
I am one of those who grew up with The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan,
Neil Young, Black Sabbath, Alice Cooper, Led Zeppelin etc. I thought it
was GREAT music and I was totally into it.
I am a musician and a composer myself, influenced from the artists and groups
above. At that time, in my teens and twenties, I was not very well educated
on the situation on this planet, even though I thought something must be
very wrong. Often I thought the rock musicians had the answers...
I know many of you might feel the same and therefore you may get upset about
what I'm now going to tell you. But believe me, I've gone through
all that myself, and after all - I was a rock musician too. The story, though,
that I will tell you makes a whole lot of sense (unfortunately) and the
glamour of rock music fades quite a bit.
The following is an excerpt from Dr. John Coleman's excellent book "The
Committee of 300", which is very informative on the subject of
the Illuminati and is highly recommended. Very much of what he "predicted"
in the early 80's happened exactly the way he said it would. The book
in itself is from the early 90's.
The Beatles and the Aquarian Conspiracy
An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even
when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group
in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent"
of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of
a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing
of which they were not even aware.
When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have
imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles
were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism
which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-2150-Policy
Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-pared by SRI Center for the
study of Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against
the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce
by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive
and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against
its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock(1)-- were introduced
to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation
to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered"
and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying
the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever
they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally,
the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles
arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished
without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and,
in particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators
as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to
the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music"
that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure.
The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the
music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given
a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England
and hence the Committee of 300.
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then
came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger
words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which
was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the
Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the
context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the
new targeted group, the youth of America.
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say
that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting
like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code
words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became
a highly visible "new type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such
it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles
and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This
was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out
by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering
tinkerers and put into action.
The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to
the success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in
Los Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will
happen with the current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will
wither on the vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then
completely withdrawn. As in 1966, the issue would become "burned out."
Street gangs will have served their purpose of creating turbulence and insecurity.
Exactly the same pattern will be followed in the case of "rock"
music. Deprived of media attention, it will eventually take its place in
history.
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock
Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like
the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the
"music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of
"Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word "lover"
is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two homosexuals
writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise
the language used in "rock lyrics."
Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the
work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the
heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared
on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger
words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its
attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words
came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies,"
"flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It
became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with
long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from
main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles
before them.
The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of
young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution
without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly,
unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive
manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana,
and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them
by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by
one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a
powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the project through
one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by
the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample"
size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the
United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading
vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out
for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the
time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate
that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving
in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar
of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of
drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant
heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily
persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing
it." Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture"
received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators
not one single thin dime.
Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the
new cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what
was going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the
same mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized
law enforcement agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.
Alan Ginsberg
Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great drug plague,
I make no apology for using language which is not customary for me to use.
One of the worst drug slobs ever to walk the streets of America was Alan
Ginsberg. This Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which
cost him nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have cost
millions of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for
drugs, and LSD in particular, reached a new high in the late 1960's,
thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's
mass advertising campaign was devastating; the American public was subjected
to one cultural future shock after another in rapid succession.
We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again, may I remind you
that this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the Tavistock training manual,
overwhelmed by its new development and, when we reached that point, our
minds began to lapse into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that
is to say, "long range penetration had taken hold of us." Ginsberg
claimed to be a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone who
ever aspired to becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated task had little
to do with poetry; his main function was to push the new subculture and
force acceptance of it upon the large targeted population group.
To assist him in his task, Ginsberg cooped the services of Norman Mailer,
a writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer
was a favorite of the leftwing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with
getting maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have
a pretext-- not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of
Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer
would talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and
literature.
This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost to themselves
was followed by every rock group and concert promoter who followed the example
set by Ginsberg. The electronic media moguls had big hearts when it came
to giving free time to these dirty verminous creatures and their even dirtier
products and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage spoke volumes
and, without abundant help from the print and electronic media, the drug
trade could not have spread as rapidly as it did in the late 1960's-early
197O's, and probably would have been confined to a few small local areas.
Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised performances extolling
the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under the guise of "new ideas"
and "new cultures" developing in the art and music world. Not
to be outdone by the electronic media, Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing
articles about "this colorful man" in the art and social columns
of all of America's largest newspapers and magazines. There had never
been such an across-the-media-board free advertising campaign in the history
of newspaper, radio and television and it cost the promoters of the Aquarian
conspiracy, NATO and the Club of Rome not one red cent. It was all absolutely
free advertising for LSD, only thinly disguised as "art" and "culture."
One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a Five-page
report in the New York Times. This is in accordance with the methodology
used by Tavistock and Stanford Research: If something is to be promoted
which the public has not yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have
someone write an article, covering all sides of the subject matter. The
other method is to have live television talk shows in which a panel of experts
promotes the product and or idea under the pretext of "discussing",
it. There are point and counter-point, both pro and con participants airing
their support or opposition. When it is all over, the subject to be promoted
has been dinned into the public mind. While this was new in the early 1970's,
today it is standard practice on which talk shows thrive.
Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly printed by the
New York Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the same amount of space in an
advertisement, it would have cost him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't
have to worry; thanks to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive
advertising all for free. With newspapers like the New York Times and the
Washington Post under the control of the Committee of 300, this kind of
free advertising is given to any subject matter, and more especially to
those promoting decadent life styles--drugs-hedonism-- anything that will
confuse the American people. After the trial run with Ginsberg and LSD,
it became standard Club of Rome practice to call upon major newspapers in
America to give free advertising on demand to people and ideas they were
promoting.
Worse yet--or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint-- United Press (UP)
picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for Ginsberg and LSD and telexed
it to HUNDREDS of newspapers- and magazines around the country under the
guise of a "news" story. Even such highly respectable establishment
magazines as "Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg
respectable. If a nation-wide campaign of this magnitude were presented
to Ginsberg and the promoters of LSD by an advertising agency, the price
tag would have run into at least $1 million in terms of 1970 dollars. Today
the price tag would be nothing less than $15-$16 million dollars. It is
no wonder that I refer to the news media as "jackals."
I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose on the Federal
Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my article, which was a good
expose of the greatest swindle on earth, to every major newspaper, radio
and television station, magazine house and several talk-show hosts. A few
made promises that sounded good--they would definitely air the article and
have me discuss it--give them about a week and they would get back to me.
Not one of them ever did, nor did my article ever appear in the pages of
their newspapers and journals. It was as if a blanket of silence had been
thrown over me and the subject I was endeavoring to promote, and indeed
that was precisely what had happened.
Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage,
the hippie-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground;
it would have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging
guitars, silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have
amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given saturation
coverage by the media, the United States has suffered one cultural shock
after another.
The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names
and faces are still not known to but a few people, made sure that the press
played its part. Conversely, the media's important role in not exposing
the power behind the future cultural shocks made certain that the source
of the crisis was never identified. Thus was our society driven mad through
psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's
training manual. From its modest beginnings in 1921, Tavistock was ready
in 1966 to launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which
has not yet ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.
Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of
drugs which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts
of money to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy.
The proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the
Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University
facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title
given to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole
population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the first
of several such institutions set up by Tavistock.
"Future shocks" is described as a series of events which come
so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I said earlier,
science has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the amount of
changes and the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After continuous
shocks, the large targeted population group discovers that it does not want
to make choices any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless
violence such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial
killers, rapists and child kidnapers.
Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely follow orders without
rebelling, which is the object of the exercise. "Future shocks,"
says SPRU, "is defined as physical and psychological distress arising
from the excess load on the decision-making mechanism of the human mind."
That is Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals--which they
don't know I have.
Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip switch, so
do humans "trip out," which is a syndrome that medical science
is only now beginning to understand, although John Rawlings Reese conducted
experiments in this field as far back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated,
such a targeted group is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs
as a means of escape from the pressures of so many choices having to be
made. This is how Drug usage was spread so rapidly through America's
"beat generation." What started with the Beatles and sample packages
of LSD has grown into a flood-tide of drug usage which is swamping America.
The drug trade is controlled by the Committee of 300 from the Top down.
The drug trade started with the British East India Company and was closely
followed by the Dutch East India Company. Both were controlled by a "Council
of 300." The list of names of members and stockholders of the BEIC
read like something out of Debretts Peerage. BEIC established the "China
Inland Mission," whose job it was to get The Chinese peasants, or coolies,
as they were called, addicted to opium. This created the market for opium
which the BEIC then filled.
In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The "Beatles"
to popularize "social drugs" with the youth of America and The
Hollywood "in-crowd." Ed Sullivan was sent to England To become
acquainted with The first Tavistock Institute "rock group" to
hit the shores of the United States. Sullivan then returned to the United
States to draft the strategy for the electronic media on how to package
and sell the group. Without the full cooperation of the electronic media
and Ed Sullivan, in particular, "The Beatles" and their "music"
would have died on the vine. Instead, our national life and the character
of the United States was forever changed.
Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the "Beatles"
campaign to proliferate the use of drugs became. The fact that "The
Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno
was concealed from public view. The prime function to "The Beatles"
was to be discovered by teenagers, who where then subjected to a non-stop
barrage of "Beatle music," until they became convinced that they
liked the sound and adopted it, along with all that accompanied it. The
Liverpool group performed up to expectations, and with "a little help
from their friends," i.e., illegal substances we call drugs created
a whole new class to young Americans in the precise mold ordained by the
Tavistock Institute.
(1) An Institute in UK where they research in mind control, run by highly
trained psychiatrists who answer to the Illuminati. From here Ayatollah
Khomeini, Radovan Karadzic and Milosevic among others were all trained for
their mission.
So far Dr. John Coleman.
It's not mentioned here, but the Rolling Stones were created from the
same source and with the same purpose. Beatles were supposed to be the "good
guys" while the Rolling Stones were the "bad guys". Also,
Rolling Stones were experts in creating repeating "riffs", meaning
a musical phrase that's looping over and over again (like in "Satisfaction",
"Jumping Jack Flash" etc.). These repeating riffs trigger the
mind and make one receptive to whatever sub-message you want to transfer
into the minds of the listener. In the case of the Rolling Stones we have
satanic messages in their lyrics, and they have repeated that over and over
through the years (a more recent example is the"Bridge To Babylon"
album).
Another interesting thing is that The Beatles were knighted by Queen Elisabeth
in the 60's for their "good work". Ringo told the press he'd
been so nervous he had to smoke pot in the bathroom before he met the Queen.
Recently Paul McCartney was knighted again. The question is:
is it the same Paul McCartney?
Unlock the key of your success by Testking HP0-Y39 exam material along HP2-Z16 ebook. By using our latest 350-050 questions and answers product and 000-108 Certification audio exam, you can easily pass with HP0-J45 certification dumps.