The Crime of…
Probably out of stupidity, the government has confessed, or acknowledged, an enormous crime.To understand this, we need to review a few simple principles relating to contractual law.
A contract is a mutually agreed relationship among
two of more parties. If there is one party, or no parties, there is no
contract.
A contract defines the rights and duties of each
party to the contract; and these rights and duties cannot be transferred to
non-parties except by mutual consent. If I order a meal from restaurant B, a
contract is thereby created: I have a right to a meal and a duty to pay for it;
restaurant B has a duty to provide the meal and a right to receive payment for
it. The meal is provided, payment is made, and the contract is extinguished.
If I ordered and paid for the meal, and restaurant
B disappeared before providing the meal, I would have no right to compel
restaurant A to provide a meal. If I disappeared before paying for the
meal, restaurant B would have no right to compel anyone else to pay for
the meal.
No one but the March Hare would even think about
transferring these contractual rights or duties to non-parties.
These principles apply even more forcefully to
contracts that pertain to fundamental rights.
A constitution is a contract – probably the most
important contract that could ever be devised.
Parties to American constitutions are “We the
people… and our posterity,” also known as “preamble citizens.” No one else can
invoke rights, protections or standing relative to such contracts (except as
specifically indicated). If there were no “people” or no “posterity,” American
constitutions would be dead instruments: they would protect no rights, delegate
no authority, impose no limits.
In other words, if the American banditti could
annihilate the “people of the United States,” its primary weapons – that is,
American governments – could operate as absolute despotisms with the illusion
of constitutionally limited governments.
This annihilation of “the people” is precisely
what has been accomplished by compelling and deceiving Americans to obtain a
Social Security card (SS card). By applying for an SS card, one volunteers to
surrender one’s status as a preamble citizen and take on the status of a 14th
amendment citizen.
In other words, this application for an SS card is
more than merely changing labels; it amounts to surrendering all rights, all
protections and all standing relative to federal and state constitutions in
exchange for very limited “privileges and immunities” granted by the 14th
amendment (which was never ratified).
The distinction between preamble citizen and 14th
amendment citizen is very clearly expressed in American law, “Every citizen of
the United States (14th amendment citizen)… shall have… the same
right [relative to certain property rights] as is enjoyed by white
citizens….” 42 USC 1982.
This is 14th-amendment language and it
clearly declares that a U. S. citizen is not a white citizen. Here,
white citizen and preamble citizen are identical terms.
With this knowledge, I resolved on a lawsuit
against the SS Administration. But, these issues were so complicated and so
comprehensive that I eventually decided to divide them into several lawsuits to
be able to deal with one or two issues at a time. Accordingly, our first
lawsuit dealt with the question of whether SS-card holders had full and perfect
standing relative to the U. S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
In our initial complaint we (six plaintiffs)
asserted, among other facts, that we were ‘preamble citizens.’
The government responded, (a) ‘in order for
plaintiffs to carry their case, they must establish that they are preamble
citizens’ and (b) ‘there is no such thing as a preamble citizen.’
Stop.
Do you comprehend what the government asserted?
If there are no “preamble citizens,” there are no
parties to the federal contract. Please, focus your thoughts, and contemplate
the meaning and consequences of this assertion. By operation of the SS card, the American banditti has deprived an entire nation of its rights, its protections and standing relative to the federal Constitution and Bill of Rights.
What shall we call this crime?
It affects more than just Americans. For more
than two centuries, America has been a beacon for all mankind, illuminating the
reality and hope of liberty.
We, and our parents, have appointed sentinels to
guard our rights. These sentinels, instead, have conspired with our enemies,
and have perpetrated a political genocide. There is no remedy for these
sentinels: when Americans discover this betrayal, there won’t be enough trees
from which to hang them. For these sentinels, this political genocide must lead
to a traditional genocide.
How shall we describe this crime?
We have struck at the heart of the matter; and the
government has confessed or acknowledged this crime. We have the facts, and
even a confession.
Should we go forward?
If so, we need support, and resources of every
kind.
If you want to support us with money, we offer
shares in our case at ten grams of gold for each share. If we lose all court
decisions your ‘investment’ becomes a donation. If we collect costs or damages,
such collections will be distributed to shareowners in the form of dividends.
If you want more detailed information regarding
the legal issues discussed in this flyer, these two publications are
recommended, Plantation America, 2nd ed., by Anthony Hargis (24.00, (20.00 plus 4.00 for p & h), 80 pp) explains the distinction between preamble and 14th amendment citizenship. Includes an appendix previously published separately as Income Tax Failures.
The Lost
Right, 3rd ed.,
by Anthony Hargis (24.00, (20.00 plus 4.00 for p & h), 112 pp),
explains the history, nature, law and technology of the right of
petition.
Send blank
money order to Anthony Hargis, 2427 N. Tustin Av, Suite B; Santa
Ana, Cal. 92705.
|