HOME

BREAKING
NEWS

BUSINESS

COLUMNISTS

ENTERTAINMENT

GOSSIP

LIFESTYLE

NEWS

POST
OPINION

Sean
Delonas

Editorials

Columnists

Letters

Books

Send
a Letter

Campaign
2004

REAL
ESTATE

SPORTS

STYLE

TRAVEL

Archives

Last 7 Days

Story
Index

Classified

Classroom
Extra

Comics

Coupons

Games

Home Delivery

Horoscope

Lottery

Newsletters

Post Store

Post Winners

Special Sections

Traffic

TV
Week

Weather

Win A Trip
On Queen Mary 2

MTA
Subway
Centennial

Mardi
Gras
Events
Schedule

Listings
& Features

The
Rhythm of Latin New York

Search
Sale & Rental Listings

Every
Tuesday

Search Archives

Contact
Us

New Jobs Open

NewsCorp Sites

Online Media
Kit

Print
Media Kit

Privacy
Policy

Terms of
Use

KOFI ANNAN'S CORRUPT ENTERPRISE

Email

Archives

Print

Reprint

April 2, 2004 -- Is the clock
ticking on Secretary General Kofi Annan's merry pranks at the United
Nations?

Could be.

The rank corruption of the body's Iraqi Oil-for-Food program is
bubbling slowly to the surface - promising to ensnare scores of
European politicians and businessmen, as well as a gaggle of Annan's
Turtle Bay colleagues.

An upcoming audit being prepared by a firm that successfully
traced stolen Holocaust-era assets is expected to confirm the names
of some 200 people and companies around the world who allegedly were
bribed by Saddam's regime.

The list, found in Iraq's Oil Ministry, was first cited by an
Iraqi newspaper, al Mada, at the end of January.

Meanwhile, the General Accounting Office estimates that Saddam
Hussein skimmed as much as $10.1 billion from the $47 billion
program - originally established in 1996 to buy humanitarian
supplies for ordinary Iraqis.

Among those expected to be named are the head of the U.N.
program, the Russian Communist Party, the PLO and "a French
businessman close to President Jacques Chirac."

This, of course, may help explain Chirac's implacable opposition
to the dispossession of Saddam a year ago.

And Kofi Annan's longtime pro-Saddam bent, as well.

As Andrew Apostolou notes on the preceeding page, Annan's
immortal words - "I think I can do business" with Saddam - take on
an entirely new meaning.

This much is clear: Saddam was able to turn the program into a
mystery- shrouded tool for sanctions-busting, bribery and
international influence-peddling.

The fog began to clear in February after the name of Benon Sevan
- the U.N.-appointed executive director of the Oil-for-Food program
- appeared on the al Mada list.

According to al Mada, individuals, corporations and political
parties on the list received cash-convertible oil vouchers from
Saddam.

Sevan apparently was given vouchers for at least 11 million
barrels of oil, worth some $3.5 billion. No wonder the program he
ran:

* Knowingly collaborated with Saddam's massive violations of the
U.N.'s own sanctions.

* Said and did nothing about the Saddam regime's use of
Oil-for-Food income to build presidential palaces.

* Ignored huge kickbacks, thereby making itself complicit in
Saddam's bribery of foreign leaders, opinion-makers and companies.

* Permitted the regime to cheat Kurds in northern Iraq of
billions - money, by the way, that is still unaccounted for.

This much, too, is clear: The vast profits for foreign companies
made possible by abuses of the Oil-for-Food program helped buy
foreign support for the Baghdad regime.

Saddam made a point of throwing Oil-for-Food business and
oil-voucher bribes at contractors from key countries, especially
those with vetoes on the Security Council, like France and Russia:

* Forty-six recipients of illegal allocations of oil were Russian
companies or individuals - many with links to President Vladimir
Putin.

* French interests were so deeply involved in corrupt
Oil-for-Food dealings that France opposed the ending of sanctions
even after Saddam had fallen.

And the scheme seems to have worked: France, Russia and Germany
were all hostile to military action to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Is it any wonder that Russia and France now oppose independent
inquiries into the scam, although Secretary General Kofi Annan -
under extreme pressure - has nominally agreed to the idea?

The Iraqi Governing Council has been probing the scam since al
Mada first revealed it. The audit, prepared for the council by KPMG
and the law firm Freshfield Bruckhaus Deringer, is due in May.

Complicating the effort, however, is the refusal of the BNP
Paribas Bank of France to make available critical Oil-for-Food
program records.

And U.N. officials in New York have declined to send necessary
statements for months.

Yes, the U.N. says an "internal inquiry" is under way.

But, given that Kofi Annan's son Kojo is linked to the scandal,
it's not hard to imagine how hard that effort will be
pressed.

And though the elder Annan has admitted to the need for an
outside inquiry, there's no reason to believe that he - or anyone
else at the U.N. - will be even slightly helpful when it counts.

Remember, folks as high-ranking as the president of Indonesia,
former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua and pro-Saddam
British politician George Galloway are implicated.

These are, after all, people with substantial influence at Turtle
Bay.

And there are others - many others - who are similarly
situated.

Plus, it has now become undeniable that the folks Kofi Annan had
running the program were fully aware of the graft they were
enabling.

Indeed, for Kofi Annan to say - as he did last week - that he was
agreeing to an investigation "because I don't think we need to have
our reputation impugned" is simply laughable.

His own son is part of it.

Here's the bottom line:

A U.N. program that was supposed to help the Iraqi people instead
stole from them - and, worse, collaborated with their oppressor.

Those responsible for this colossal theft are international
criminals - and the same goes for those who covered for them at the
U.N. Secretariat.

The United Nations itself stands bereft of moral authority when
it comes to Iraq, and to America's heroic effort to reclaim that
tortured nation for its people.

Kofi Annan needs to disappear, and to take his son with him.

Neither Jacques Chirac nor Vladimir Putin possess a shred of
decency, so nothing can be expected from them.

But none of them - not Annan, not Chirac, not Putin - has
any standing in the debate over Iraq's future.

The same goes for the entire United Nations, as well.

Back to: Post
Opinion | Editorials
| Oped
Columnists | Letters
| Books |
Home

Breindel Award
2004 | Competition
Criteria | Entry
Form

NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of
NYP Holdings, Inc. NYPOST.COM, NYPOSTONLINE.COM, and
NEWYORKPOST.COM
are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc. Copyright 2004 NYP
Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.